Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

News and Entertainment in the Digital Age: A Vast Wasteland Revisited

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
2,654
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
There is no Interactive Transcript.

Uploaded by on Sep 14, 2011

In 1961, Newt Minow — then Chairman of the Federal Communications Commission — delivered a landmark speech to the National Association of Broadcasters on "Television and the Public Interest," in which he described television programming as a "vast wasteland" and advocated for public interest programming. Fifty years later Newt Minow — and a slate of distinguished guests — reflect upon the changed landscape of television and dramatic shifts in the broader media ecosystem, and identify lessons learned that may help to offer insight into the next 50 years of media and public discourse.

Guests include Harvard Law School Dean Martha Minow, Ann Marie Lipinski of the Nieman Foundation, Jonathan Alter of Bloomberg View, Yochai Benkler of Harvard Law School, as well as Terry Fisher, Yochai Benkler, John Palfrey, and Jonathan Zittrain of Harvard Law School. Other respondents include acclaimed historian Doris Kearns Goodwin, Susan Crawford of Cardozo School of Law, Perry Hewitt of Harvard University, Ellen Goodman of Rutgers University School of Law - Camden, Virginia Heffernan of the New York Times, Former Chairman of the FCC Reed Hundt, Former Chairman of the FCC Kevin Martin, Nicholas Negroponte of One Laptop per Child, Ethan Zuckerman of C4/Berkman Center.

More about this event here: http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/events/2011/09/vastwasteland

CC licensed image courtesy of: http://www.flickr.com/photos/41836833@N06/4935804220/#/

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (4)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The debate is not so good. But it's very informative.

  • If James Der Derian had been there, it might have been a real debate and discussion. He should be at Harvard. Then things might get interesting.

  • I disagree. It is too close and cozy, everyone seems to be related, and the debate and discussion is actually very weak. And explains the incredibly impoverished state of television and journalism in America, not to mention academia, public and private. If Newt is responsible for everything, then Newt is responsible for everything. Everyone patting everyone else on the back, for what? It is pathetic.

  • This is simply the best discussion of the media I have ever seen. There are great thinkers tackling the real questions of the moment.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more