Intro Part 2 - 9/11 Conspiracy Challenge

Part 2 of my introduction, and a challenge to 9/11 Conspiracists

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 9/11
• conspiracy
• philosophy

[stonecd]

dumb question-On the foggy morning of Saturday, July 28, 1945 At 9:49 a.m., a ten-ton, B-25 bomber smashed into the north side of the Empire State Building and didn't bring it down??:P

[totovader]

Is that a question? Doesn't look like one.

Do you understand the differences between a B-25 and a 767? Do you understand the difference between an accidental crash and an intentional one? Do you understand the difference between the construction of the Empire State Building and the Twin Towers?

Those are questions.

[nameofthepen]

totvader sez: "If your claims were similar to 2+2=4, then they would be THE WIDELY ACCEPTED POSITION, and you wouldn't be struggling to get support on your side."

Group-think is the ultimate authority, toto?

[1966BOBBY]

-Believe me, you're not impressing a soul. Any thoughts on what Baconian means yet?

[Coventry27]

And to think that you actually go to bed each night feeling a sense of security knowing that your government is protecting you? I've looked at ALL of your "stuff" on here, and not only does none of it hold water, it's a bit out dated too. There is a new truth movement going on, and it's not a bunch of kooks and whackos that espouse lurid theories about what did or didn't happen on 911. You seem to be a bright (misguided) young man. I suggest you WAKE UP and be a TRUE PATRIOT.

[Bongofury361]

Yeah, you did so much research into 911 that you thought the main columns were made of concrete!

Complacent? Don't you mean COMPLICIT? You are an idiot if you think that you are using reason, and that any reasonable person would respond to your silly challenge. EVIDENCE? How about 3 steel buildings, falling at near free-fall speed, with everything pulverized to dust! Didn't you see the pics of the steel columns with CLEAR, ANGLED CUTS? Or, how about the lack of evidence, like...plane wreckage!

[Bongofury361]

Your challenge is stupid! You're asking CT's to provide one example of evidence that would change our minds, and you responded by saying evidence of explosives would have done it for you. In light of the fact that there were several incidences on that day, how the hell are we expected to come up with ONE thing that would change our minds? Do you think anyone was looking for explosives? No. They were looking for bodies. Why was all the steel evidence carted quickly away and sent off to Asia?

[ltchimpo]

Ryan. You are the shit! I miss you dude.

[totovader]

Quit stalling. If you don't understand the question, then watch the video again.

Last time I'm going to ask you.

[totovader]

Of course there was- but if all you can do is claim that you're right without any understanding of what you're supposed to be right about, then you're a complete waste of time: you're nothing but a joiner with no mind of your own.