James Von Brunn, holocaust museum shooting, "extremism" and "hate"

The Stench of Truth 168 James Von Brunn the alleged shooter at the Holocaust Museum is allowed to think and write whatever he wants to. Once he crosses the line into committing violence or killing people then he has broken the law and should be punished. Hate crimes are useless. Is a death for one motive different or more severe than another?? Stop the use of this as fuel to the hate crime legislation debate, and for anti-"extremism" legislation. Also isn't this just a little convenient in light of recent actions by Obama toward Islam and Israel??? This guy could have been a tool.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• James
• Von
• Brunn
• extremism
• holocaust
• museum
• shooting
• hate
• freedom
• of
• speech
• thought
• crime
• internet
• control
• liberty

[TheRivetthead]

i have a right to be an extremeist or a hater its my 1st ammendment right a crime is a crime theres no such thing as a hate crime or extremeist violence

[tenebroust]

@TheRivetthead I agree, the idea of a "hate crime" is to have your thoughts judged. It is ludicrous.

[CAPTAINFRED999]

I used to hear people say, "Oh so-and-so is a nazi", and I would think "whatever!". More hyperbole, right? But after reading Jim Marrs' Book, The Rise of the Fourth Reich, I am convinced that there really are nazis around and they are more powerful now than ever. To get really into the nuts and bolts of it, Google between the lines by Dave Emory. He's been covering this issue for years and has podcasts available for the illiterate masses. Listen and learn! It will soon make sense.

[tenebroust]

Absolutely I could not agree more, they never died. As Joseph Farrell says it is interesting that after WWII the German Army and the Civilian government surrendered but not the Nazi Party.

[brianFURY]

SecretTrollAccount said lose the aggression-- I say keep the aggression, we need more aggression toward pursuing just causes and rational thought. That is the problem of the masses. Lack of aggression on the part of the populace is ultimately why the elites screw the hell out of the masses every single chance they get. If the common man were as aggressive as the elites we would not be consumed by the problems we all face today.

[tenebroust]

I agree. I thanked STA for the input because I appreciate all input. I think that we need to be aggressive, not threatening, at least not in this venue, or at this time, but aggression is needed.

[Zyworski]

On the hate crime topic, taking it one step further. The law has set up special classes of citizens, kill a cop special sentence, kill a postman special sentence, juvenile victim special sentence, elderly victim special sentence. Does the weakness, strength, employer or anything else make one person or class of persons worthy of greater protection under the law? I won't take a position other than to say that I recall no public debate on the topic prior to passing these special laws.

[Zyworski]

I wish that they had left James Von Brunn's comment up on the Internet so that I could compare them to some of the trolls lurking about here on YouTube.

[suutari13]

I agree with you!

[catdad69]

again, talk to me for the truth. evbrunn@yahoo.com

[chiomob]

Good riddance.

[RonPaulHatesBlacks]

Fuck yeah. Say hi to Satan for his, you sick bastard!

[MIKESOWELL]

James Von Brunn has just met his Maker