Part 2. The North American Technate TNAT Technocracy

This is a series of lectures given by a member of TechnocracyInc. This series explains basics of the Technate design for North America.
This series was recorded in 1980. The information presented, accurately portrays the Technate design for North America.
That information is also available in the original paper copy of the Technocracy Study Course... the precedent document regarding the Technate scientific social design.
The Technate design precludes special interest groups.
It is based on science and is not an oligarchic belief system concept.
It uses a system called energy accounting. It is not a political system.
It is not connected to any other groups or ideas other than the Technical Alliance... the original group that presented these ideas.
The Technate design is the viable alternative to the current Price System method.
Investigate and join with us to make the information concerning this subject available to interested parties.
As our resource base becomes destroyed we begin to bumper up on a time when real alternative ideas must be used if survival is desired.
The Technate design provides abundance within the context of sustainability.
It does not use the scarcity based system that has been employed in the past (the Price System).
The use of mechanical energy has altered the reference points concerning how a society can be governed. Functional governance is now possible. The Technate design is secular and humanitarian... creative and imaginitive.
Investigate the North American Technate design. TNAT http://technatedesign-tnat.blogspot.com/
The North American Technate TNAT

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• TechnocracyStudyCourse
• EnergyAccounting
• TechnateDesign
• HowardScott
• M.KingHubbert
• TNAT
• environment
• Technocracy

[coyotee62]

How is this posting influenced by T Boone Pickens, an energy robber baron?

[TBonePickensetc]

@coyotee62 Not in the least. Its a play on words and a joke reference. That guy is a corporate fascist price system flunky.... just as you imply... so not to worry. Technocracy design is entirely different.

[tryingtobereal]

This is an awesome presentation.

[ngonea]

Thank you for this presentation, I have shared it widely, how can I get involved?

[TrueSacredRahXephon]

@MacabreManifesto Trying to fix the system using its rules is like trying to fix your car while sitting in the passenger seat.

[a2007raul]

@MacabreManifesto

Wow dude the Technocracy design precludes special interest control that's the whole point. Your using axiologist terminology to advocate forms of opinionated control. The design outlined in the Study Course was built this way for a reason. your ideas are way off sorry

[newb2yutube]

@MacabreManifesto Please check out or read the Study Course if you haven't done so already. 

[newb2yutube]

@MacabreManifesto Almost all poor populations rely on offspring to handle the struggle of surviving(i.e. farmers and tribal people). Others can be from lack of education(i.e. todays teens). Education and limiting the need for more offspring through raising the standard of living would help with that issue.

Through technology it is very possible to answer those questions if the need arises. Hopefully, as I already pointed out, preventative tools are used.

[MacabreManifesto]

@newb2yutube When we are deciding on how large our population is going to be allowed to grow, are we going to have enough room at the end for everyone to have a house or an apartment? Are we going to allow everyone to have a car, or will there be so many people that everyone will have to take mass transportation? Science can find how many houses we can put on earth, but only we can decide if we will encourage everyone to aim for a population where everyone can own a house or an apartment.

[newb2yutube]

@MacabreManifesto Technocracy is the application of technique to society for functional control. Ethics and "power issues" are moot. Whatever works wins outs. That is science. How can this system "corrupt" when it's based on science? Even if you replace the people, the system stays the same. This is why morality and ethics are pointless and not a part of Technocracy technate design. Yes, there are extreme cases the system may not be able to handle very well, this isn't meant to be perfect.

[newb2yutube]

@MacabreManifesto ethics mainly involve private property or other price system related things. As Tbone has stated, trained people such as medical professionals or whatever field is related to the "problem", would address that issue. The problem of ethics however is irrelevant and pointless to this discussion. Why would "ethics" be determined by democratic vote or anybody for that matter?...

[MacabreManifesto]

@TBonePickensetc I have never heard either side proposing a way to deal with ethics ever. Both Tech and Jacque (not Zeitgeist, I think that they are loons) claims that most crime would go away but what would be a crime? Even if you implement a society where all goods and services could be provided, which would reduce crime to the absolute minimum, how would you deal with people who wanted certain culture related things illegal? Such as nudity. Science doesn't invent a constitution