Darwin VS Design Dr. Stephen Meyer

short statement

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• stephen
• Meyer
• Darwin
• VS
• Design
• evolution
• designer
• intelligent

[Epyon42]

Sweet christ, you'll argue anything will you? If I saw you're using the wrong definition, you'll argue that definitions are nothing compared to the god. What's next, if I say your facts are inaccurate, you'll tell me the concept of facts are nothing compared to the truth of god? Seriously dude, look at yourself. You're an imbecile.

[ThinkerHA]

That's why science deals with evidence and not personal beliefs.

Intelligent design was ruled as unscientific at Dover in 2005.

[SanRandomNumber]

Why was that clip 2 seconds

[Hufflewaffle]

...one of which is religious and the other being scientific

[scottpastry]

@Leivinn20 "What do you mean with "evolution""

i mean what science means. that is, changes in allelic frequency will occur in isolated populations over time, causing speciation.

"There is a lot natural factor which overcome any capacity for surviving of any species."

evidence for this??

[scottpastry]

@Leivinn20 "I can show by means of experimental test that all selection process leads to reduction of biodiversity."

awesome. please tell me about this test.

"Randomness by definition implies there is not trend. It means, it's not necessarily true that fittest appears when it's need"

randomness does indeed mean that. and its also correct that not all species can adapt to their changing environments. its called extinction :)

[Leivinn20]

@scottpastry : 1) I can show by means of experimental test that all selection process leads to reduction of biodiversity. 2) Randomness by definition implies there is not trend. It means, it's not necessarily true that fittest appears when it's need. What do you mean with "evolution"?. There is a lot natural factor which overcome any capacity for surviving of any species. Atheists claim; Science is based on natural laws, randomnes is not trend.

[scottpastry]

@Thistlesifter220 "Just because some liberal pinko judge, in the pocket of the card holders, makes a ruling, has little or no bearing on reality"

but the presiding judge, John Jones III, was a well known conservative. obviously you are arguing from ignorance.

"Dr. Meyer has totally refuted darwinism"

which peer reviewed paper of meyers was published in a scientific journal, refuting 'darwinism'?

and what is a darwinist anyway?

[scottpastry]

@Leivinn20 1)neither. it selects for the most adapted to its environment. 2) it is impossible a completely nonsensical sentence 3) evolution occurs now, just as it has in the past.

[Thistlesifter220]

@ThinkerHA Was that the same court system that ruled it's okay to murder babies? How about let OJ Simpson go after murdering his wife? Just because some liberal pinko judge, in the pocket of the card holders, makes a ruling, has little or no bearing on reality. But, you go ahead and cling to that if you like.... Dr. Meyer has totally refuted darwinism....

:-)

[TheNylonStrings]

Dover, bitches.

[Leivinn20]

The three upper gods of evolution are: 1) Darwin of fallacies (Does natural selection selects to fittest, or viceversa?) (his revelation is his sacred book called Origins Of Species), 2) Randomness of gaps (can randomness do what natural laws can't do such as showed in the lab, no matter how many attempts?), 3) The really long god of time, known as god of hope...less too (can the natural laws do something on the past which they can't do on the present?). I prefer trust on God.