@arsacesofconcobar Yes it's funny how we modern First Worlders are still for the most part as poor as peasants when it comes to getting decent medieval military equipment!
@DarthFanta Though I must confess that an armoured horse would have been a most impressive sight. The cost and knowledge of replicating it, though, seems to be through the roof.
This is why we have seen so few cataphract re-enactors. The few attempts of replicating the barding for the horse have either been incomplete trappings or trappings that look compromised (Again, due to costs).
@DarthFanta Not always. The clibanarius (Lit. ovenman) is thought to be derived from the Old Persian term for "neck-guard bearer" which would designate an armoured horsemen. Mielczarek furthermore delineates that the term "cataphract" was applied to anyone that was by Graeco-Roman standard a heavy cavalryman.
Horse-trappings became a famous attachment to the term following the ubiquitous battle of Carrhae 53BCE. Furthermore, replicating a barding for the horse costs a lot of money.
excellent, however are you sure your repicatng a cataphract? its just ive seen images of a 3rd century cataphract also possessing a lamellar shirt on top of maile.
but you seem to look the part of a lesser, but still quite heavy cavalry, and i STILL wouldnt want to be on the recieving end.
@arsacesofconcobar Yes it's funny how we modern First Worlders are still for the most part as poor as peasants when it comes to getting decent medieval military equipment!
trenchwire 13 hours ago
okay, the first 7secs made me very uncomfortable :D
FatalRamses 1 day ago
@DarthFanta Though I must confess that an armoured horse would have been a most impressive sight. The cost and knowledge of replicating it, though, seems to be through the roof.
This is why we have seen so few cataphract re-enactors. The few attempts of replicating the barding for the horse have either been incomplete trappings or trappings that look compromised (Again, due to costs).
arsacesofconcobar 2 months ago
@DarthFanta Not always. The clibanarius (Lit. ovenman) is thought to be derived from the Old Persian term for "neck-guard bearer" which would designate an armoured horsemen. Mielczarek furthermore delineates that the term "cataphract" was applied to anyone that was by Graeco-Roman standard a heavy cavalryman.
Horse-trappings became a famous attachment to the term following the ubiquitous battle of Carrhae 53BCE. Furthermore, replicating a barding for the horse costs a lot of money.
arsacesofconcobar 2 months ago
That is not a cataphract. The rider looked authentic, but the problem lies with the horse. A true cataphract rides a equally armoured horse.
DarthFanta 3 months ago
excellent, however are you sure your repicatng a cataphract? its just ive seen images of a 3rd century cataphract also possessing a lamellar shirt on top of maile.
but you seem to look the part of a lesser, but still quite heavy cavalry, and i STILL wouldnt want to be on the recieving end.
elgostine 9 months ago