Evolution Creation Debate part 3/5

Evolutionists & scientists speak out against Darwin. Darwin was wrong! The Cambrain explosion proves a sudden appearance of fossils billions of years ago, they did not evolve as Darwin theorized. The fossil record supports a Creator. There is change within a species, but this does not prove we evolved from a common ancestor. There are many breeds of species & many differences within a particular species (change within a kind) - All dogs for example belong to the dog family.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• evolution
• creation
• fossil record
• cambrian explosion
• evolution creation debate
• Darwin
• creationist
• atheism

[shann0rla]

These creationists know full well what evolution tries to teach.

They recognize that it isn't observable, reapeatable science.

They're more aware of what can and can't happen than the darwinist bozo with all his 'perhaps' and 'it could happen'.

Yeah, and monkeys might fly out your ear!

Saying a fish pushing itself up out of the water to get a breath creates morphological change is like saying a body builders baby will be born bench pressing 200 lbs. Ridiculous.

[TruthPurposeLife]

I actually had to stop and imagine a time when I did not believe in God or anything for that matter. How absolutely stupid it really is to believe that we all evolved from one ancestor! how rediculous it is to actually believe in such a cultish theory. It really is laughable! Imagine a fish growing legs??? oh my.. And to think that hundreds of millions of species came into being by chance! wow! The Bible says everything was made after its own kind! G! I guess the fossil record proves that too!!

[shann0rla]

@TruthPurposeLife

Evolutionist belief in the 'nothing' that trancends the laws of science is a religious cult. Sure as any babylonian mystery cult on the face of the earth.

[TruthPurposeLife]

Some of these evolutionists actually believe that information is added over time!??? thats remarkably rediculous. Even when I didn't believe in God I thought that is insane to believe. There is an overwhelming amount of historical facts, and evidence that supports the authenticity of the Bible, the eye witness accounts of Jesus and all the miracles & fulfilled Bible prophecies etc.. but evolutionists don't know this, and tragically most in Christianity do not either.

[DeviantCare]

Creationists trying to be the rational side.. yap... kay.

[juuonse]

@TruthPurposeLife mutations "add" information to a genome in the exact same way that re-organizing the basic alphabet into different orders forms hundreds even thousands of different words and languages. If by information you mean the amount of "data" within a genome then yes, information is added through duplication and errors that creates in the gene. You both really need to get a grip what the theory of evolution is and isn't. These creationist dimbwits in this video clearly don't know.

[simpsonmark]

Where is thew `'dabate' is this programme?

[yamclam]

@TruthPurposeLife ... the fossil record does... Educate yourself before entering a debate, then maybe you'll realize what an ignorant fool you look. I won't even bother explaining how utterly wrong your description of 'fish growing legs is'

[nondescriptman]

This is a false dichotomy. Even if you could disprove evolution, it would not prove the creation story of the bible.

[MarketAccount]

AWSOME Argument, KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK!

[thedayitriedtodie]

@TruthPurposeLife

Question: is Lazarus from the old Testament Jesus, beta version? He rose from the dead way bfr Jesus, according to the fairy tale in the old testament...

and yes, i'm dwight.

[squirreljester2]

And what about vaccines? Are you trying to say they had nothing to do with evolution?

[squirreljester2]

Frame shift mutations, such as what happened with Nylonase bacteria, "added" information.

[acnemaster]

Ohio State and well respected don't go together.