LEMUR is a family of gyro-stabilized
fragment-protected, electro-optical sights
and remotely controlled weapon systems.
The fl exible modular design allows
LEMURTM to be customized for a large
variety of requirements.
It can be used in a number of applications
on such different types of platforms as:
• Fire control system against ground and
air targets.
• Sight and designator for missile control.
• Commander's sight.
• Forward observer instrument.
• Remotely controlled weapon station.
and with optional launchers for countermeasures.
@MapleSephiroth Not the ones that come thru the top of the turrent .
GalaticSpaceHero 3 months ago
@MapleSephiroth A good portion of the usable M1s are still A1 or A2, which has this "little" problem...aaaand the first and second gulf war weren't that long ago...
AKAtheA 4 months ago
@AKAtheA That was a LONG time ago. The APU is mounted inside the tank instead of outside now.
MapleSephiroth 4 months ago
@MapleSephiroth the M1A2 has been repeatably proven to have it's APU disabled with a .50 cal :D
AKAtheA 4 months ago
@Alloyaha ATGM's are used to kill main battle tanks. A .50 cal won't even scratch a T90, T72, or M1. An ATGM is very cost effective though, dude. You can use a 14,000 dollar missile to destroy a 4,000,000+ dollar tank.
MapleSephiroth 5 months ago
@Alloyaha ATGM's are used to kill main battle tanks. A .50 cal won't even scratch a T90, T72, or M1. An ATGM is very cost effective though, dude. You can use a 14,000 dollar missile to destroy a 4,000,000+ dollar tank.
MapleSephiroth 5 months ago
@tibchy144 those are not armor piercing rounds.. maybe that is wyh numb nut.
MrAzzman31 1 year ago
@mymonterey For one it's cheaper. You can either fire an ATGM for about $14,000 a shot. Or a burst of .50 cal for about $2.00 a shot? Which would you rather have your tax dollars used for? Cheap and effective, or expensive and effective?
Alloyaha 1 year ago
to shot at two target at the same time
nananghb 1 year ago
looks like it didnt penetrate the armor plate
tibchy144 2 years ago