@phpeni I will, however. just for fun, play devil's advocate on this argument. If you can provide any tiny shred of a shred of shrapnel of legitimate evidence whatsoever that "the general public find[s] 'Public Face King' funny", then we're going to have a real conversation. If not, fuck the fuck off, you pretentious fucking dipshit (with all due respect).
@veinknamjenbi The lack of knowledge about basic scientific concept plus denial of reality is a common creationist trait (I know this because I've talked with a lot of them :p ). Look up scientific fact.
I've shown you the facts and you just put your fingers in your ears and sing "la la la you made a typo so I'm right" :D
If your next comment aren't a valid argument for the proposition that the general public doesn't find panic face king funny, I will not respond.
@veinknamjenbi Facts is observations, that's just the definition.
Where have I cherry picked?
I'll repeat my question: If people didn't generally find panic face king funny, how likely is it that we see such an owerwhelming abount of likes to dislikes over thousands of votes.
How do you blend creationism into this :s? (the answer is no btw)
@phpeni Facts and observations are nowhere near to being equivalent, and the obscene thing you've done with my words is called "cherrypicking", and sometimes also "quote mining".
@Bundalaba Don't be racist on my channel.
veinknamjenbi 6 days ago
@phpeni I will, however. just for fun, play devil's advocate on this argument. If you can provide any tiny shred of a shred of shrapnel of legitimate evidence whatsoever that "the general public find[s] 'Public Face King' funny", then we're going to have a real conversation. If not, fuck the fuck off, you pretentious fucking dipshit (with all due respect).
veinknamjenbi 1 week ago
@phpeni I have never said what you seem to think I've said.
veinknamjenbi 1 week ago
@phpeni You've made a lovely strawman there. I hope you don't expect me to put any life into him.
veinknamjenbi 1 week ago
@veinknamjenbi The lack of knowledge about basic scientific concept plus denial of reality is a common creationist trait (I know this because I've talked with a lot of them :p ). Look up scientific fact.
I've shown you the facts and you just put your fingers in your ears and sing "la la la you made a typo so I'm right" :D
If your next comment aren't a valid argument for the proposition that the general public doesn't find panic face king funny, I will not respond.
phpeni 2 weeks ago
@phpeni "Facts is observations, that's just the definition."
Facts *are* observations. That's just the grammar. And, your definition of "fact" is adorable.
I see your question, and I raise you the point of its absurdity, as it is based on the notion that Youtube "likes" are some sort of metric of fact.
It is merely your standards of evidence that bring creationism to mind.
veinknamjenbi 2 weeks ago
@fenderkid6 Quite the reverse.
veinknamjenbi 2 weeks ago
@veinknamjenbi what am I struggling with then? I don't understand how one needs an operation to be a transvestite, if that's what you were saying.
fenderkid6 3 weeks ago
@veinknamjenbi Facts is observations, that's just the definition.
Where have I cherry picked?
I'll repeat my question: If people didn't generally find panic face king funny, how likely is it that we see such an owerwhelming abount of likes to dislikes over thousands of votes.
How do you blend creationism into this :s? (the answer is no btw)
phpeni 3 weeks ago
@phpeni Facts and observations are nowhere near to being equivalent, and the obscene thing you've done with my words is called "cherrypicking", and sometimes also "quote mining".
Good luck with that particular strategy.
veinknamjenbi 3 weeks ago