blatantly biased CBS News Omits 2nd place Ron Paul from New Hampshire Poll results

In the Suffolk University Poll, Ron Paul came in 2nd place at 14% behind Mitt Romney but the blatantly biased CBS News completely blacked out Ron Paul's results and instead show the third, fourth, and fifth place winners. The actual poll is linked below, and a more recent one shows Ron Paul climbing up to 18%, while other polls have shown him at 24% in New Hampshire. If you view the entire CBS segment, also linked below, not only did CBS omit Ron Paul from the poll results, they COMPLETELY blacked out Ron Paul's Iowa caucus results in which Paul came in 3rd place, only 3% behind first place winner Mitt Romney. In this biased news report, EVERY Iowa candidate - Romney, Gingrich, Santorum, Huntsman, Bachman, Perry - were named EXCEPT for 3d place winner Ron Paul. The CBS anti-Paul bias has been a long running issue - does anyone remember when Paul got less time then every other candidate at the CBS Debate? How about when Paul's name was omitted from the CBS Evening News Poll on Dec. 20 when he came in 3rd place (see the video response)? And that's just for starters. Before seeing this CBS video today, earlier in the day I submitted a new article called "CBS Media Whores Pimping the Parliament of Whores (And Ignoring Ron Paul)" http://emazur.freeshell.org/CBS_News_Pimping_the_Parliament_of_Whores_and_ign... & I've included a sample paragraph below. I've noticed that one of the media whores (and I don't mean that in a sexist way) is Nancy Cordes. Jan Crawford is another common figure, as is John Dickerson.

CBS full video segment (you can see where they omit reporting on Paul's Iowa performance):
"New Hampshire is the new Iowa" 1/5/2012
http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=7394032n&tag=mg;earlyshow

Poll results 1/4/2012:
http://www.suffolk.edu/images/content/FINAL.NH.Marginals.Jan.4.pdf
Q7. If the Republican Primary for President of the United States were held
today and the candidates were {alphabetical} Michele Bachmann, Newt Gingrich,
Jon Huntsman, Fred Karger, Ron Paul, Rick Perry, Buddy Roemer, Mitt Romney, or
Rick Santorum for whom will you vote or toward whom would you LEAN at this
time?
N= 500 100%
Michele Bachmann ............................... 01 11 2%
Newt Gingrich .................................. 02 46 9%
Jon Huntsman ................................... 03 37 7%
Fred Karger .................................... 05 3 1%
Ron Paul ....................................... 06 71 14%
Rick Perry ..................................... 07 7 1%
Buddy Roemer ................................... 08 5 1%
Mitt Romney .................................... 09 213 43%
Rick Santorum .................................. 10 29 6%
Undecided (DO NOT READ) ........................ 11 78 16%

Excerpt from "CBS Media Whores Pimping the Parliament of Whores (And Ignoring Ron Paul)" http://emazur.freeshell.org/CBS_News_Pimping_the_Parliament_of_Whores_and_ign...

If you take a look at the front page of the politics section of the CBS News website on 1/6/2012, you'll see that they have a box with the election results for the Iowa caucus: 25% for Romney, 25% for Santorum, and who the hell knows what percent for 3rd place winner Ron Paul because his name and picture are nowhere to be found (he was bewteen 3 and 4 percent behind being tied for 1st by the the way). There are several other featured stories relevant to the election- Boston Globe endorses Huntsman -- not Romney, Mitt Romney's post-Iowa Momentum real?, Political Satire in Time for the New Hampshire Primary, and a story about how John Huntsman is upset with Ron Paul because some random schmuck on the internet uploaded a youtube video that questions whether John Huntsman is a true American and distastefully shows a photo of his Chinese daughter. Although we are told there is "no evidence" that connects this video to the Ron Paul campaign, we still get a message from Cindy McCain on twitter for Ron Paul: "shame on you".
But I was mostly interested in coverage of the upcoming primary election in New Hampshire, so I clicked the story titled Is New Hampshire anyone's game? Anyone but Ron Paul is the answer, for in the entire 12 and half minute segment, the names are dropped are Mitt Romney, Rick Santorum, John Huntsman, Newt Gingrich, and even Rick Perry. Ron Paul's name is not mentioned one single time, even though he is polling second in New Hampshire at 24%, and even though John Dickerson, the man who CBS assigned to cover Ron Paul's Iowa campaign, is present in this 3 person discussion. The other 2 people are Jan Crawford, who CBS assigned to cover Mitt Romney's Iowa compaign, and Nancy Cordes, who said in the discussion that Mitt Romney is "completely inevitable" as the nominee. These media whores were paving the way for Romney and pretending that Ron Paul didn't even exist. But they knew full well who he was.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Ron
• Paul
• poll
• new
• hampshire
• iowa
• primary
• caucus
• media
• bias
• whores
• nancy
• cordes
• cbs
• republican
• romney
• santorum

[peterjheins]

It appears like Paul isn't even on the ballot.  The media does not realize it has a responsibility and its losing credibility. This story is so similar to V for Vendetta. We need a march on Washington!

[mrlush123]

I know Ron Paul has enough supporters to do some damage. Make them feel it. I just contacted CNN and expressed my disgust

.

[MMAExpertKnower]

This is disgusting? ARe we living in a communist country? WTF is going on here? is there any trustworthy news organization anymore? We need to do somehting about this bullshit media!

[xoxoamandakisses]

ron paul 2012

[joeylodes]

Bullshit!!!!

[pulseft]

ABC News Radio in Los Angeles reported the same Censored polling results, excluding Ron Paul's 2nd place polling place the same morning that CBS released their censored poll results. What is going on with the media manipulation these days??

How the hell are we supposed to find out out polling results if the largest news corporations censor them??

[tanksbb]

CBS answered the complaints by saying she had 1st Amendment rights, but this off the chart. This is outright voter FRAUD.

[maynard700t]

C- Controlled

B- Biased

S- Scamps

[JCHumphrey1]

You know, as irritating as PaulBots can be, I feel a little insulted by this as well. I don't care who the candidate is, it is their job to report the whole story. This isn't fox news, but not even fox news would omit a 2nd place candidate like that. Unacceptable.

[Sevenfold120]

@mrlush123 Does CNN Own CBS?

[MarshallLore]

I just watch youtube myself. Havent watched regular TV for a couple of years.