Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

2009-12-1 Copenhagen derailed China, India, South Africa & Brazil promising to walk out

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
3,781
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 1, 2009

InterPlanetary Climate Change exposes Global Warming Scam
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6P_hkDDb8YE

"BRIC Countries solve Dollar Collapse using National Currency"
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=F969216534E28B4D

NWO Stand-off & US dollar Gold backed-Benjamin Fulford"
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=4F9D9E307C6BB5FB

http://www.cecaust.com.au/
Citizens Electoral Council of Australia
Media Release 1st of December 2009

Craig Isherwood‚ National Secretary
PO Box 376‚ COBURG‚ VIC 3058
Phone: 03 9354 0544 Fax: 03 9354 0166
Email: cec@cecaust.com.au
Website: http://www.cecaust.com.au

Queen flexes muscle to demand Copenhagen genocide treaty

Just as the climate change hoax is about to derail completely, Her Britannic Majesty herself, Queen Elizabeth II, whose family spawned the modern green genocide movement*, has pulled rank on the Commonwealth group of nations—her repackaged Empah—to demand they deliver a treaty at Copenhagen.

*(Royal Consort HRH the Duke of Edinburgh, Prince Philip, founded the World Wide Fund for Nature [WWF] in 1961, as a charity vehicle for his fellow European aristocrats and their corporations to finance green movements around the world to stop economic development and reduce human population.)

The Queens extraordinary intervention smacks of real desperation—she knows her familys long-term survival as modern feudal monarchs depends on her carefully-cultivated image as a powerless, quaint figurehead, so the stakes must be high for her to feel the need to flex her considerable muscle, which is derived from her royal Prerogative Powers, which include the powers: * to declare war; * choose and appoint all commanders and officers by land, sea, and air; * convoke, adjourn, remove, and dissolve parliament; * dismiss the prime minister and choose whom she will as the replacement; * choose and appoint all judges, councillors, officers of state, magistrates; * bestow all public honours, including creating a peerage for membership of the House of Lords or bestowing an order of chivalry; * conclude treaties; * initiate criminal proceedings, and bestow pardons; * and many others, which she has shown in the past she is willing to use, notably when she sacked the Whitlam government in 1975, whose buy back the farm policies were a threat to her own control of Australias raw materials wealth exercised through her ownership of Rio Tinto.

For the British imperialists, what is at stake if the global warming fraud fails, is the continuity of empire itself, in the form of globalisation. To survive in the face of the global economic collapse, nations are reasserting their national sovereignty, backing away from the free trade and deregulated finance policies that are the cornerstones of British imperialism.

(In a world of total free trade, freed from government regulations and protections, it is money which dictates terms, not governments, and that money is directed from the City of London—that is the British Empire. When nations reassert their sovereign laws to exert national controls over money, the City of London—the Empire—is defeated.)

Climate change promised to be the mechanism to both further globalisation, in the form of binding international treaties, global government institutions, and a new financial architecture centred on carbon emissions trading, as well as to deliver on the Prince Philip-led goal of human population reduction, by denying nations the right to develop high-density energy sources and high-technology primary and secondary industries, thus condemning them to poverty, squalor and mass death.

In the countdown to Copenhagen, that plan derailed: China and India refused to bow to the treatys demands to slash agriculture (China, India, South Africa and Brazil issued a joint declaration in Beijing on 27th November, promising to walk out of Copenhagen to protect their national interests); hackers or whistleblowers exposed the actually deliberate scientific fraud by the worlds leading so-called climate scientists at the University of East Anglias Climatic Research Unit (CRU); and in Australia, which under British agent Kevin Rudd was appointed to take the lead on global action on climate change, the parliament deadlocked, and was unable to pass the key climate change legislation, the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), which Rudd was hoping to parade as action at Copenhagen.

This is the context in which the Queen herself has intervened, but a revolution is underway: instead of the usual grovelling acquiescence shed expect, aside from the biggest nation in her Commonwealth, India, lining up against her (see above), her ordinarily very loyal Opposition in Australia has shifted under intense public pressure, and dumped the climate change believer Malcolm Turnbull as leader, for avowed sceptic Tony Abbott, to stymie the ETS bill altogether.

  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (ThankYouWhiteKnights)

  • the queen doesn't have the powers or royal prerogative (anymore anyway). The powers are in the hands of the Prime Minister. The Queen can only dismiss a prime minister, devolve parliament and open parliament up. But she has to have a good reason to do so otherwise the british media will give her a smack across the face.

  • interesting yes i dont profess to know all that you said. I am just putting up the good news i think is right. Although i could learn it 1 day after i take care of other priorities

Top Comments

  • Yes because then she can save Philip from having to die and come back as a virus

  • Carbon Trading is purely an attempt to impose a Global Tax and must be avoided at all costs. Back in the 70s people were panicking about "Global Cooling", so which is correct, if either?

see all

All Comments (56)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @davyro66: We had our carefully "staged" Referendum that was deliberately biased toward the Status-quo. Our current government is getting a right "royal" serving over the idea of any form of Emmissions Trading.

  • If we dont like the ruling elites and there cohorts lets stop playing with there toys

  • @RoyalPrinceXenu The trade in Carbon is a hot bed of crimminal activity in europe with the tax payer at the receiving end an as usual the EU power elites seem inexplicably opposed to end this lucritive crime.

  • The Crown (ROYAL FAMILY) has long standing intrests in Rio Tinto mines,mining for Uranium (CANADA/AUS) thats used for the weapons industry (DEPLETED URANIUM) causing cancer and birth defects, and wasn't it the arms industry in the frame for Princess Dianas death probably interfering with the flow of money into the Monarchs special bank account with Lloyds of London

  • nothing wrong with the reading, thanks for sharing bro! have many friends in the UK

  • Uhhh there is a ton of non-biased, and easy to find, empirical evidence that shows how our planet is getting more warm. Regardless of a global trend or human contribution our planet is factually getting warmer. To pretend that it is simply a conspiracy theory is petty and ignorant. Really to have a complete lack of understanding of chemistry, physics and other general sciences that demystify what we enter into the world and how it can negatively impact the delicate balance(s) is irresponsible.

  • don't take the bait from the prick,anyways im English i fucking hate the royal family,if there was a referendum for us to get rid of the horrible inbred bastards,they'd be gone,at the end of the day when she is pushing her nose into this there is obviously an agenda,i hope the Aussies get a referendum because i know they will sack the inbreds straight away

  • so why have you no uploads?

    nothing to share just take take take and demands

    the world owes you doesn't it

    even us doing it for free

  • do you complain about many things?

    do i have a contract with you?

    did i offer something and not deliver?

    did i charge you for this presentation giving you the right to complain for services you thought you were going to get?

  • listen to yourself wining like a ******

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more