CrossTalk: Blair's bloody hands

In this program Peter Lavelle asks his guests whether Tony Blair and George Bush will ever be held accountable for breaking International law and going to war in Iraq.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Peter Lavelle
• Cross Talk
• Tony Blair
• George Bush
• Andrew Gilligan
• Ted Bromund
• Iraq
• Hashim Ali
• Elena Khanga
• USA
• UK
• nuclear program
• Iraq war
• law
• war
• NATO
• weapons
• public opinion

[bandaidmafia]

Put all those Zionist bastards on trial for treason...

[RussianDefender100]

That Crooked teeth English Tony Blair

is a criminal like Monkey Bush

[bocanutz]

This moderator is contradictory and unknowledgeable about "international law."

Mr. Bromund is a very intelligent man but nobody listens to a word he says.

[BeholdZeus]

And why hasn't the US signed up to the International Court of Human Rights...Because it is a warmongering state controlled my a ruthless and cold-blooded military-industrial context. Dollars for blood: that's what it's all about!

[BeholdZeus]

The media conveniently forgets that the US and UK backed Iraq in the Iran-Iraq war and in fact bankrolled the conflict. Read your damn history books! Broumond is a contemptible ideologue and should be tossed head first into the center of Fallajuah in nothing but his underwear. He'd soon learn how stable Iraq is then!

[BeholdZeus]

Oh yes, and Iraq did comply for further weapons inspections. Blix was given open access on almost every occassion. Inspectors like Ritter constantly stated that there were no WMDs and yet he was given no media coverage. We all know what the war was about: 1) oil, 2) to extend the impetus for a military-industrial complex, 3) to create a a second US satellite state (Israel being the first) close to Iran. Oh and Iraq was given chemical munitions BY THE F**KING US!

[BeholdZeus]

The war was ILLEGAL under the Kellog-Briand Pact, the Geneva Conventions, the Rome Status and the Nuremberg Principles. Incidentally, the British and US failed to get a second UN Resolution. They managed to get Resoluton 1441 which called for further weapons inspections, but the US and UK were too trigger-happy and went without the necessary and legally binding second resolution, Moreover, the Security Council can never sanction war. 45 minute claim was false and WMD claim was false.

[callouschristian]

They always blame the "intelligence" when answering questions about deception. Then Fail to talk about the real intelligence that was quieted. Who outted Valerie Plame again? And what was her husband's name and why was his life destroyed? Because he offered the truth to the "faulty intelligence".

[eyeswideshuttt]

This was a beat around the Bush segment.

[dietermaas]

I don't know, if someone will understand my analogies here, but somehow the anglo-american establishment with their fear of terrorism either they are just "using" this reptilian "good and bad" logic, to keep people in an emotional blind state, or they are in that fear themselves. I even feel myself becoming reptilian when I read a lot abt this subject. Here is a simple exercise to "unreptilize": get in front of a mirror, and pretend to smile for 60 seconds. That will bring you back to human.