Micro vs. Macro Growth

Does microevolution over time lead to macroevolution? Are they just the same process viewed with different timescales? This video should put that debate in perspective. See my other videos for actual biological evidence of macroevolution. Remember, macroevolution has been directly observed in the lab and in nature. You can deny it all you like but your opinion doesn't change the facts.

To download this video go to:
http://www.mediafire.com/?febtzcwncfi

If you wish to translate this video you can download the PowerPoint file from:
http://www.mediafire.com/?njxtj2dmjh4

Learn the facts, spread the truth, and most importantly, Think About It.

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

• Micro
• Macro
• Evolution
• Creation
• Intelligent
• Design
• ID
• Education
• Fact
• Redwood
• Growth
• Analogy

[retrosyk]

This is fucking genius.

[kotoroshinoto]

I love the song, LOL

[BailiffQuimby]

@Luigi84289 "God can be debunked by looking at his own attributes"

That can only work on a specific definition of a specific model of god, and not on every god-concept out there.

[Luigi84289]

@BailiffQuimby God can be debunked by looking at his own attributes thereby disproving him with his own book. Philosophical thought will also ultimately lead to the conclusion that you cannot have 2 coexisting infinite realities outside one another. That would contradict what Infinity means and make Infinity into things. Infinity = everything. No evidence for a god can be presented. He's just a bunch of contradicting concepts thought up by bronze age ignorant man.

[BailiffQuimby]

@Luigi84289 "just not believing solely because of a lack of evidence makes you a weak Atheist."

Not believing because of lack of evidence makes me an honest atheist. It's the same reason most people don't believe in bigfoot, alien abductions, and leprechauns. The primary reason for not believing in something is that there's no evidence for it.

"Either what the bible says is true or is not. "

And while I agree that it is not, that only assesses the efficacy of the bible's version of god.

[BailiffQuimby]

@Luigi84289 "I have knowledge that there is no God"

That is not logically possible. Speaking as a fellow atheist, that is an arrogant claim to make, and you have no method of demonstrating it to be true.

"The Judeo Christian God can be debunked with basic logic"

Well of course. The concept of Yahweh is accompanied by several other claims which are demonstrably false. But it doesn't logically follow that there is no such thing as any kind of god anywhere in existence.

[Luigi84289]

@BailiffQuimby I have knowledge that there is no God. The Judeo Christian God can be debunked with basic logic. Thereby proving there is no God. You can use many other methods of doing this but just not believing solely because of a lack of evidence makes you a weak Atheist. Either what the bible says is true or is not. Christians try to put their own person interpretations on God but that kind of God is subjective to the individual Christian. It is created by their minds. Only the Universe=God

[BailiffQuimby]

@Luigi84289 No, I was saying that *I* was playing devil's advocate, by arguing the theist side. I'm a staunch atheist. All I'm saying is that I wouldn't use the specific arguments you are using, nor would I argue that it is justified to claim knowledge that there is no god. I'll settle for disbelief on the grounds of total lack of evidence in favor of god.

[Luigi84289]

@BailiffQuimby No it's not playing Devils advocate if he does not obey the laws of logic than he can in no way be human or related our minds at all. If he cannot even strings things together the foundation of logic and reason than we are above him. Common sense. He can either think or he can't. To say that's playing Devil's advocate is just being silly.

[BailiffQuimby]

@Luigi84289 "If we are made in God's image he must obey the laws of logic. "

Playing devil's advocate, "made in god's image," doesn't necessarily mean "every aspect of god and every aspect of man are corresponding." Very few theists will give that line the same meaning. Some just think it means "spiritually" or in terms of our moral compass or something like that. The better argument against god breaking the laws of logic is that it is a fallacy of special pleading.