Christopher Hitchens vs Laura Ingraham, Doug Wilson [1 of 4]
Top Comments
Video Responses
All Comments (1,106)
-
She needs to see the first minute of video:
Carl Sagan on "God" and "gods"
/watch?v=4E-_DdX8Ke0
-
I cringe every time somebody asks what came before time...
-
Unbiased referee, my ass.
-
The photos used for the speakers speak volumes.
-
It's a point that can only be made if we superimpose OUR locale (time-space) on ALL else in all time AND "?non-time?"
-
-
To argue first cause or infinite regression is to be absolutely ignorant to the nature of information itself. If anyone can tell me WHEN 2+2 first started to equal 4 then I'll admit that looking at so-called 'infinite regression' would be a valid point to examine. Until then, the nature of information itself needs not and cannot have a catalyst. The "problem of first cuase" is not a problem. It a point that can only be made if we superimpose OUR locale (time-space) on ALL else in all time.
Arguing with Christopher Hitchens is like poking a sleeping dragon in the eye with your dick.
TheGyromorgian 4 months ago 20
@newj34 Holy books that say women are second class citizens, homosexuals are doomed to fire, all other nonbelievers will go to hell, it is ok to beat children, thought crime is illegal, and on and on, cause more trouble than anything. Those who are religious and remove these unsavory aspects make it more respectable, but religion in its purest form is fraught with tribal evil.
thesands49 7 months ago 18