Gordon Brown Calls GW Skeptics "Flat Earthers, Anti-Science"; Philip Stott Responds

No description available.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Gordon Brown
• Philip Stott
• global warming
• flat-earthers
• anti-science

[nosequiters]

i think i can add too this debate by saying the blue painted girl has nice tits

[doodydude234]

I like her jugs.

[MegaPostman77]

Gordon Brown knows bugger all about Science. If scientists told him pigs were causing global warming, he would more than likely believe it. What a dickhead! Never trust authority or politicans!. Wise advice any day of the week!

[dwolfcoach]

WTF, 95% of scientists believed in eugenics? What kind of propaganda move was that? UGHHHH!

[ToxicTeapot]

@thebestsumoeva Exactly. Couldn't put it better myself :)

[thebestsumoeva]

@ToxicTeapot If it was a money making tool it wouldn't be so bad, in reality it's a great power grabbing tool. They now think they can tell us what temperature our houses may be, what kind of light bulbs we can use, how to get to work, how much food we can have, where we can live, how much we can spend, and soon they will be telling us how much fun we can have. This is nothing short of replacing freedom with a compulsory government that thinks it knows more than we do.

[ToxicTeapot]

Global warming is simply promoted by Government because it is a great money making tool.

[tapefilms]

@BriansVideoHobby and its also scientist that are trying to find cleaner energy sources today and all of the medicines that we know today and lots of other very useful things, all governments care about is money, they dont actually look at statistics and see what would be better for the people and try to figure out better ways of running the world, they just tell us that they are right and anyone else is wrong

[BriansVideoHobby]

@tapefilms Yes, we could all eat genetically altered plants and animals laced with powerful hormones and pesticides. Sounds like a utopia. You must be very young. You do realize that it is science that brought us fossil fuels on a massive scale? That they failed to predict what the effect would be of burning those fuels?

[andy765gtr]

this lindzens scientific arguments are so good why hasnt he convinced the scientific community. monkton, stot, lawson, lindzen et al are all the same, whatever the stage theyve reached in the denialist chain of bullshite, they resort to direct appeals to the public and policy makers rather than the actual science community. they are adept at moving the goalposts

monkton, the most famous denier of all, does or has, strenuously denied c02 is a greenhouse gas.

[LordVigeous666999]

And as far as lindzen, don't just say, "he is debunked". On what? By who?

I mean, I could go around saying, "The IPCC is debunked", but it wouldn't mean a thing until I bring up specifics

So, lets get specific