D'Souza / Loftus Debate, Pt 6/13

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
3,288
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 22, 2010

www.sjcnc.org
"Does the Christian God Exist?": A Debate between Dinesh D'Souza and John W. Loftus, 2/9/10.
Mr. D'Souza is the author of _What's So Great About Christianity?_ and answered in the affirmative; Mr. Loftus, author of _Why I Became an Atheist_, answered in the negative.

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • D'Souza is destroying this fool.

    And I'm not religious. 

  • Great job by dinesh.

see all

All Comments (32)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Loftus' arguements are horrible, terrible... embarrassing (there's much better arguements for atheism other than "My opponent is ignorant" LOL). D'Souza's are not that great but at least they are presented well.

  • @bigdefense777 totally agree. Loftus was terrible. I mean come on, if you really wanna provide evidence against god it ought to be scientific at the very least. And Loftus's theory on quantum tunneling is a very hard concept to grasp...even for scientists. Just read up quantum tunneling. I studied it at university. It's like saying given many chances, a person will be able to walk througha concrete wall. Almost all physicists wont accept his theory on and thats why Dinesh called him a liar.

  • Dinesh doesn't know SHIT about neuroscience.

  • Dinesh: "If their brains died how are they still with us?"

    0.o What a dumbass

  • 2:09 - D'Souza, if guy comes to me and says; I he saw a guy with ten eyes", I would not believe him. Why? Because I have seen tens of thousands of people and they all have two eyes.

    YET, D'Souza argues that 2000 years ago a guy rose from the dead... WHY?

    Simple, double standard.

  • The problem with the atheist question of the supernatural is they wait for an explanation of the supernatural before they prove the God of the bible. Once you prove the bible is inerrant or can't get a good argument otherwise, then you've proven God and the supernatural becomes feasible. Not the other way around - prove the supernatural first.

  • Dinesh is a total fool.

  • @jdavidw3 It doesent happen just because you write so here. And especially since it already happend.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more