D'Souza / Loftus Debate, Pt 6/13
Top Comments
All Comments (32)
-
Loftus' arguements are horrible, terrible... embarrassing (there's much better arguements for atheism other than "My opponent is ignorant" LOL). D'Souza's are not that great but at least they are presented well.
-
@bigdefense777 totally agree. Loftus was terrible. I mean come on, if you really wanna provide evidence against god it ought to be scientific at the very least. And Loftus's theory on quantum tunneling is a very hard concept to grasp...even for scientists. Just read up quantum tunneling. I studied it at university. It's like saying given many chances, a person will be able to walk througha concrete wall. Almost all physicists wont accept his theory on and thats why Dinesh called him a liar.
-
Dinesh doesn't know SHIT about neuroscience.
-
Dinesh: "If their brains died how are they still with us?"
0.o What a dumbass
-
2:09 - D'Souza, if guy comes to me and says; I he saw a guy with ten eyes", I would not believe him. Why? Because I have seen tens of thousands of people and they all have two eyes.
YET, D'Souza argues that 2000 years ago a guy rose from the dead... WHY?
Simple, double standard.
-
The problem with the atheist question of the supernatural is they wait for an explanation of the supernatural before they prove the God of the bible. Once you prove the bible is inerrant or can't get a good argument otherwise, then you've proven God and the supernatural becomes feasible. Not the other way around - prove the supernatural first.
-
Dinesh is a total fool.
-
@jdavidw3 It doesent happen just because you write so here. And especially since it already happend.
D'Souza is destroying this fool.
And I'm not religious.
bigdefense777 1 year ago 5
Great job by dinesh.
ProudToBLoud 1 year ago 3