Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Past & Future Climate Change - Pt 2 of 4

Part 2 - Scientist David Archibald continues his analysis of the data concerning climate change & it`s causes to then predict what the future climate is likely to be. Inconvenient Truth author Al G...  
 
Customize

More From: Bushvision

Past & Future Climate change pt 3 of 49:35
4,416 views
Past & Future Climate change - Pt 1of 49:21
17,230 views
Climate Change - Bob Carters 5 Tests of CO2 part 19:44
17,441 views
he case against dangerous global warming pt 1T9:00
1,531 views
Climate Change - Bob Carters 5 Tests of Co2 part 28:30
9,668 views
Professor Fred Singer on Climate Change Pt  17:12
7,213 views
Global Warming, Fish & Sunspots  part 39:26
605 views
Science & Social aspects of climate change pt 39:13
1,919 views
Bob Carter Science & Social aspects of climate change pt49:37
2,031 views
The Media & the global warming Hype - John Stossell9:41
8,556 views
Bill Kininmonth - Analysing the IPCC`s climate change models9:20
2,521 views
The case against dangerous global warming pt 39:16
491 views
Science & social aspects of climate change pt 29:29
2,440 views
Climate Change - Is CO2 the cause? - Pt 1 of 49:41
263,973 views
Past & Future Climate Change - pt 4 of 44:30
6,207 views
Climate Change - Is CO2 the cause? - pt 3 of 48:29
70,941 views
David Archibald - Global Warming & Sunspots explained9:34
22,606 views
Evidence CO2 does not cause dangerous Global warming1:50
14,432 views
Recent Trends show No Global Warming0:30
10,914 views
Cost of the ETS0:30
3,438 views

QuickList(0)

Featured Videos

29 ratings
Sign in to rate
5,327 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (7)   Options

Loading...
justanoldman1 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I have a friend that funs a commercial greenhouse and they generate CO2 to help the plants grow stronger. They like levels of over 1000 PPM. CO2 is not a polutant and what we should be fighting is real polution like what the city of Victoria B..C. dumps into the ocean everyday. How can you people from B.C. join any green group when victoria is dumping raw sewage into the Pacific ocean everyday. Let CO2 increase, it is only at about 350 PPM and we could use it quite a bit higher for the plants.
GODSjudgment (10 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
thanks for telling the truth nor lies like ail whore does ,
raymondbe (1 year ago) Show Hide
 -2
Marked as spam
Temperature and solar activity data have actually diverged since 1980 so although there was a correlation in the past it's now clearly not the case. Solar activity continued to fall after 1980 while temperature kep rising sharply. See video titled "Global Warming Swindle Debate Pt2".
HellisLikeNewark (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Really? I googled charts of Cycle 22, which started in 1986 was short (less than 10 years). Global temps also rose (satellite data) from 1985 until around 1990. They rose again in the 90's (cycle 23 started around 1996) but not as much as the 1986 Cycle 22 start. This may have been due to a solar min in 1992 + Mt. Pinatubo erupting in 1991.
HellisLikeNewark (1 year ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
Overall solar radiance also increased from 1980 on until the mid 1990's. This also correlates with a sharp increase in satellite monitored temps, which peaked in 1998.
justmenowagain (1 year ago) Show Hide
+5
Marked as spam
I believe you are entirely wrong about global temperatures. They have dropped a whole degree all in one year and it took about a hundred years to raise it one degree. The sun has been sun spot dead for two years, and if it doesn't spark back up we will find ourselves in another little ice age. I suppose this would crush all that global warming fanatics have been working on, but don't worry being cooler is a lot more dangerous for civilization than being warmer.
musicequalstruth (9 months ago) Show Hide
+3
Marked as spam
That debate was completely biased and still proved nothing about CO2's role in warming. The data that showed rising temps after 1980 was based on info from IPCC that is now proven inaccurate. They failed to explain the importance of urban heat islands role in calculations, though it was mentioned and quickly disregarded. Besides, there has been overall cooling trend since 1998. Carbon tax is world Gov't, simple as that. And guess who founded the carbon credit company - Al Gore. He wants money

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.