9/11 Firefighters Testimony On Explosions In WTC1

911 Firemen Explosion Testimony Just Released By NIST

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• 911
• 9/11
• World
• Trade
• Center
• Firemen
• Explosion
• Testimony
• Just
• Released
• By
• NIST
• wtc1
• wtc2
• wtc7
• towers
• first
• responders
• cnn
• abc
• nbc
• fox
• msnbc
• cbs
• RT
• infowars
• news

[josarhus]

@fakeyf9 The plane he is talking about, the second plane, hit the building before they responded to the WTC, so they were not in any lobby, but in Brooklyn at the time of the attack.

When they went to the WTC, they did NOT go into the lobby of any of the towers, but into the Lobby of the Marriott hotel, were they waited.

I can document what I have just written, can you document that they were in the North Tower or that they were there when the plane hit?

[goateedswinger]

@blite13 Can't be bothered to reason with you, so I'll quote from "youstupidmoron", who is pwning you on another of these vids:

The buildings did NOT fall with "no resistance" , you fell for a myth that was dismissed as myth a long time ago, it simply isn't possible because there absolutely were floors below that were intact until they were crushed by the above floors.

[josarhus]

@Dulcimerea The antenna fell with the rest of the top. And the fall was not sudden, there were many indicators leading up to the collapse.

Did you know that sevarl pepole survived inside the core of WTC 1, several floors up?

[josarhus]

@Dulcimerea What evidence are you talking about?

Yes concrete used for floor slaps do, it is not the kind you use building bunkers. The light concrete used will turn to dust, even if you bang it with a hammer.

Earth gravity is the answer you are searching for, I don't know about Jupiter but on earth the energy in a falling mass will reach for the sky even when only falling a few meters.

[josarhus]

@Dulcimerea I agree on the aftermath, all the windows would have been blown out in surrounding buildings, but they didn’t. It is very clear from video taken after both collapses that the windows in surrounding buildings survived. Even when WTC 7 fell, only very few windows broke in WTC 7 itself.

[josarhus]

@Dulcimerea Why don't you ask the firefighters in question, if they used the word explosion as a simile or if they actually think that something exploded?

Secondly I don’t agree that you can compare fireworks to explosives exploding; there is a difference since fireworks are quite slow burning while demolition or military charges are high explosives. Have you heard both, even a layman can tell the difference.

[Dulcimerea]

@josarhus "not only would feel like an explosion, the aftermath would also look like it."

Only superficially. An explosion is very different from a gravity impact. I agree they could be confused. But anyone who has been to a fireworks show knows the sound of a detonation.

Aftermath: Also very different, tho it would look the same to an untrained eye. Blast damage is different than impact damage. Blast waves travel miles per second. Note hundreds of windows blown out with no debris impact.

[Dulcimerea]

@modshroom

Thank you for your scientific analysis.

[Dulcimerea]

@blite13

Exactly. Thank you for the common sense.

[Dulcimerea]

@josarhus "No evidence exist at all, that any kind of planted explosives were used." On the contrary, much of the available evidence indicates the extremely HIGH probability of explosives and the extremely LOW probability of collapses WITHOUT explosives.

Concrete does NOT turn to dust from falling through air, for example.

Much of the floor concrete became the "cloud". Maybe concrete can smash itself to powder, just by falling on itself, on Jupiter; but not on Earth..

[Dulcimerea]

@Bobbo63 Partly, it did. Some indicators:

Sudden fall of WTC1 antenna. Many one-floor-height pieces of columns blown out sideways. "Pancaking" didn't happen, but if it had it wouldn't have taken down the core, but would be like rings on a ring toss.

Core columns went through floors rather than floors going through columns. Demo sequence was complex but must have had charges throughout, from basement to top.

- opinion based on 30 yrs construction experience (not high rise)