Mark 16: Those Wacky Verses!
Uploader Comments (SeenAndNotSeen)
Top Comments
-
LASSIE NOOOOOOOOOOOO!
-
kudos to Seen! This indeed is fucking hilarious. At least Aml admits the Bible has mistakes and is a very human book.
Cheers!
Video Responses
All Comments (36)
-
This video is mere mockery; it does not really address the scientific evidence about Mark 16:9-20.
-
It is proven that the story of mary magdalene is a fake/forgery and does not exist in the earliest manuscripts. Such that it has been removed from modern bible translations. A great parable, but has nothing to do with Jesus, didn't even happen........
-
@ebizmobile Oh he's confused...by your logic Gahndi, a man who could easlily be considered Jesus reborn, is in hell now. You suck.
-
YOU ARE CONFUSED - DO YOU HAVE NOTHING ELSE TO DO.? YOUR "CLEVERNESS" WILL CATCH UP WITH YOU SOON.................
-
Why not just cut them out? They obviously don't belong in Mark. I don't get why fundies insist that these verses stay in the Bible. Keeping them just causes doctrinal problems and provides fodder for skeptics, as this video demonstrates.
-
The disciples were the world's greatest explorers LMAO
-
Every single time there is a new discovery that absolutely hammers the bible...it retreats to some failsafe... only for that to become another accident waiting to happen.
There must be lots...just about ready to be denied possibility right now... do we know which ones?
-
Are you now... 'interpretting' the bible... are you actually using reason to attempt to put 'reason' into this... in doing so... aren't you changing its meaning...
If in the future we find another meaning for some of these words... what will happen to your 'interpretation' then?
Also... can I ask? what exactly was it that the Devil or Satan or Baal Zebûb ...or whatever his name is... well I just don't find anything 'bad' or 'evil' that he done.
-
AHAHAHHA, funny video, loved it
It's seems pretty low to first assert the text in question was an interpolation and then ridicule it as if it were the original text of the author.
mushmouth4life 2 years ago
I never implied that it was by the original author. I am ridiculing these verses specifically because they are so blatantly forged. You can see my explanation of what makes the forgery so obvious in my comments to the user "jacobwesson."
There are, however, people who insist that those verses are still valid, because without them, there is no resurrection account in Mark, the earliest gospel. This video can be enjoyed by non-believers and biblical purists alike.
SeenAndNotSeen 2 years ago