Questioning evolution theory THIS IS INCREDIBLE

Please feel free to comment and rate this video as you see fit. Please do not flame me as I am not the original poster of this stinky piece of garbage.

Original Poster: http://www.youtube.com/user/SerpentSlayer1

Original Description:

******
How latest discoveries in Biology are disproving Darwinian Evolution Theory. Scientists are bailing out of this theory in droves!
Category: Howto & Style
Tags:
evolution Darwin theory Dawkins origen species
******

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• evolution
• Darwin
• theory
• Dawkins
• origen
• species

[inscenceburner]

Is it inconcievable that Darwins theory of evolution is true?

What thing that is created can be created without a process of assembly?

[BlessedCompost]

The question is not whether or not things "created" have a process of assembly, it's whether or not that assembly is guided by a conscious mind. Just about everything in nature that has a discernible pattern has a process of assembly but it would be asinine to say that ALL those processes were therefore led by a mind.

Gems, for example, form as a result of collected carbon and extreme pressure, things that can very well happen incidentally under the ground, in nature.

[ProfMTH]

Quite right. That argument has been thoroughly debunked. That the advocates of "intelligent design" keep offering this refuted argument betrays the intellectual and factual backruptcy of their claims.

[ThatWrongGuy]

another argument for irreducable complexity all examples of which have been diproven.

new argument please.

[GreenSlugg]

@ThatWrongGuy Can we see a microorganism evolve something as complex as the bacterial flagellum in a lab??? That would be a refutation. We have not seen anything like this, yet E. Coli bacteria can undergo 10 million years worth of human generations in less than a week. It supposedly took less than half of that for the "ape-like ancestor" that evolved into both humans and chimps to evolve into humans. Where is the actual scientific refutation of irreducible complexity? It isn't there!

[gastarbeiter1]

Behe is so flawed.Irreducible complexity?Laughable.He has not presented one and lost on court^^

[wavenaboard]

What a load of compost...

[0538957]

@BlessedCompost Look you can try to twist science anyway you like, religion always has, the end result is just the same, you'll die and your body decays. The only way you live on is by passing on your DNA.

It is just death, everyone does it, don't be a coward! No need for religion if you are brave.

[poggeh]

The mouse trap analogy is so bogus. Anyone who doesn't understand that evolution means to "make better over time" needs to stop joining in these discussions. Put it this way: Evolution most likely WOULD come up with the mouse trap as we see it today. This does NOT mean that in previous evolutionary stages it didnt have more parts, but that arent needed. Anti-evolutionists only seem to think that parts are added, and cant be removed. It's not Irreducible complexity, its complexity made efficient.

[wowamonn]

@johnspartan98 Can you please provide the source for your comment please.

[johnspartan98]

For those that think this has been debunked, it hasn't. Unless you consider outrageous, absurd, and irrational explanations as your proof of debunking.

[xXpimpleXx]

1. Things that occur in nature have more complexity than created objects.

2. Evolution by natural selection is NOT based on chance. In fact it's the very opposite.

This is pseudoscience at it's ugliest. I pity those gullible enough to fall for it.

[zzzzJAGJEETzzzz]

this is pseudoscience, the people who made this documentary should be ashamed.

[SolidAir54321]

Search for an episode of Nova called Intelligent Design on Trial. Then watch it.