IAMA: Ron Paul | reddit's top ten questions (Part 1 of 5)

No description available.

• Category

  People & Blogs

[william9545]

Dipshit evolution doesn't explain life's beginning, that's abiogenisis. Evolution is the change of current life.

[James Hughes]

This question comes from: POTATO_IN_MY_ANUS...

[haroldinhodavinci]

For every scientist who claims Global warming is a problem there's one who claims that it's not? Bullshit. 99.84% of peer reviewed papers on the subject support the concept of global warming. So yes, 0.16% vs 99.84% seems like a pretty even spread...

[sam Friedberg]

99% of scientists see climate change as fact. Paul is just as bought as the other politicians.

[ziqondeath]

If a theory doesn't have enough proof to back it up it is not a theory, it is a hypothesis. Evolution is a scientific theory, which means that it's basic premise is accepted due to overwhelming evidence but the exact way it works may have some small dispute. much like the difference between Einstein's Theory of Gravity and Newton's one.

[razioth]

hello circlejerk

[Bloodtoker]

As are you. "Bru Ce Ban Ner"

[Bruce Banner]

You're an idiot. "Blood Toker"

[TransfoCrent]

CARL SAGEN BLESS YOU

[Bloodtoker]

Ron Paul is such a tool ._.

[ActuatedGear]

You need to look up the difference between a hypothesis and a theory.

You think the theory of evolution is a hypothesis of evolution. That it is an untested, unsubstantiated guess. This is not so.

Also look up the difference between Law and theory. Theory explains facts. Whereas a Law would explain mathematical relationships, Theory defines causation links. Both are derived from facts. Both are highly tested and at time of writing, unfalsified. At any moment they can change via new evidence.

[M4rkh0lm]

LIKE THIS IF YOURE A STRONG ATHEIST REDDITOR WHO DON'T NEED NO GOD.