IAMA: Ron Paul | reddit's top ten questions (Part 1 of 5)
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like reddit's video.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike reddit's video.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add reddit's video to your playlist.
Uploaded on Sep 8, 2009
No description available.
-
Category
-
License
Standard YouTube License
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
The interactive transcript could not be loaded.
Loading...
Loading...
Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.
Loading...
Advertisement
-
7:42
IAMA: Ron Paul | reddit's top ten questions (Part 2 of 5)by reddit
17,263 views
-
38:00
IAMA: Penn and Teller | reddit's top ten questionsby reddit
310,560 views
-
36:39
IAMA: Grant Imahara | reddit's top ten questionsby reddit
273,950 views
-
7:28
IAMA: Ron Paul | reddit's top ten questions (Part 3 of 5)by reddit
12,471 views
-
8:43
IAMA: Mike Rowe | reddit's top ten questions (1 of 5)by reddit
70,754 views
-
6
videos
Play all
Christopher Hitchensby AtheistStream
-
Ron Paul
103,737 videos7K
-
22:11
Ron Paul speech to Tea Party uncensoredby RTAmerica
155,987 views
-
6:34
Ron Paul On Evolution Vs. Creationismby Morrakiu
10,843 views
-
12:14
Ron Paul's Greatest Debate Performance Ever (10-18-2011)by KramerDSP
497,106 views
-
6:30
IAMA: Ron Paul | reddit's top ten questions (Part 4 of 5)by reddit
10,302 views
-
13:41
Ron Paul Courageously Speaks the Truthby RonPaul2008dotcom
2,279,798 views
-
10:00
Ron Paul's Words of Warning From 1983 to 2008by KramerDSP
215,617 views
-
8:06
Ron Paul Interview 1988by birdynumnum2007
101,584 views
-
9:15
reddit.com Interviews Barney Frank (1 of 5)by reddit
67,615 views
-
5:56
IAMA: Ron Paul | reddit's top ten questions (Part 5 of 5)by reddit
11,459 views
-
4:47
Ron Paul: Impeachment & Predicting 9/11 in 1998by CauseAndEffectPost
36,977 views
-
3:50
Hitler Loses Faith in Redditby ventedsnare
162,165 views
-
9:07
IAMA: Mike Rowe | reddit's top ten questions (3 of 5)by reddit
152,740 views
-
9:57
IAMA: Mike Rowe | reddit's top ten questions (5 of 5)by reddit
26,994 views
-
9:48
2007.11.01 Ron Paul Spartanburg GOP Executive Meeting Part 5by Gary Coats
36,485 views
-
2:50
Ron Paul: "I should have punched Bruno"by JoinRonPaul
557,927 views
- Loading more suggestions...
Top Comments
william9545 9 months ago
Dipshit evolution doesn't explain life's beginning, that's abiogenisis. Evolution is the change of current life.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
James Hughes 8 months ago
This question comes from: POTATO_IN_MY_ANUS...
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
All Comments (520)
ziqondeath 3 weeks ago
If a theory doesn't have enough proof to back it up it is not a theory, it is a hypothesis. Evolution is a scientific theory, which means that it's basic premise is accepted due to overwhelming evidence but the exact way it works may have some small dispute. much like the difference between Einstein's Theory of Gravity and Newton's one.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
razioth 1 month ago
hello circlejerk
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Bloodtoker 1 month ago
As are you. "Bru Ce Ban Ner"
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Bruce Banner 1 month ago
You're an idiot. "Blood Toker"
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
TransfoCrent 1 month ago
CARL SAGEN BLESS YOU
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Bloodtoker 1 month ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Ron Paul is such a tool ._.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
ActuatedGear 1 month ago
You need to look up the difference between a hypothesis and a theory.
You think the theory of evolution is a hypothesis of evolution. That it is an untested, unsubstantiated guess. This is not so.
Also look up the difference between Law and theory. Theory explains facts. Whereas a Law would explain mathematical relationships, Theory defines causation links. Both are derived from facts. Both are highly tested and at time of writing, unfalsified. At any moment they can change via new evidence.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
M4rkh0lm 1 month ago
LIKE THIS IF YOURE A STRONG ATHEIST REDDITOR WHO DON'T NEED NO GOD.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
595o 2 months ago
But natural selection is one of the things that makes evolution possible (next to mutations and possibly recombinations) , evolution, the adaptation throughout the generation borders, is the effect of natural selection if you will.
And if you want to call it "natural selection" if humans steer these changes willingly, that's fine with me, after all humans are part of nature, but there are enough cases where such adaptation happens without human conscious intervention.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Melissa Mullen 2 months ago
The issue is that just about all of the changes we've observed only occurred with the trigger of an outside force (an intelligent being, aka humans). And you seem to be talking more about natural selection than evolution. Honestly, evolution has become so muddled up that there is really no definition for it anymore; but I think most people nowadays would agree that the world is too complex to have been created by the growth of unicellular creatures crawling out of a primordial soup.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube