YouTube home Comedy Week on YouTube
Upload

Can stereotype threat explain the gender gap in mathematics performance and achievement?

psychology4all psychology4all·2 videos
10
2,274
Like     Dislike 4

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like psychology4all's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike psychology4all's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add psychology4all's video to your playlist.

Uploaded on Dec 6, 2011

Video about a forthcoming article in "Review of General Psychology" by Gijsbert Stoet (University of Leeds) and David C. Geary (University of Missouri).

Reference:
Stoet, G. & David C. Geary (in press). Can stereotype threat explain the gender gap in mathematics performance and achievement? Review of General Psychology.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

The interactive transcript could not be loaded.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

Uploader Comments (psychology4all)

  • psychology4all

    On the 18th of January 2012, the paper was published by the APA as Online First.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate psychology4all's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate psychology4all's comment.

Top Comments

  • fringeelements

    He didn't argue against female verbal ability, he argued for male math and visual-spatial ability.

    · 6

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate fringeelements's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate fringeelements's comment.
    in reply to SuGaRuSh14 (Show the comment)
  • fringeelements

    Well your claim that there are subtests on any IQ test or equivalent where males and females perform equally is simply wrong. I'm not going to argue this, the data is available, just look at it and accept that you're wrong.

    No, I don't provide sources in youtube comments.

    · 4

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate fringeelements's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate fringeelements's comment.
    in reply to SuGaRuSh14 (Show the comment)

All Comments (27)

Sign in now to post a comment!
  • banacek8675

    I'm not going to waste my time defending my statements as you've already demonstrated your lack of etiquette.

    I would not have to post comments like the aforementioned if the media was not so misandric and acted as if women are morally superior.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate banacek8675's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate banacek8675's comment.
    in reply to SuGaRuSh14 (Show the comment)
  • fwanksajerk

    so you're saying we don't need public dollars to go to programs like STEM because there isnt a problem

    cool glad we agree

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate fwanksajerk's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate fwanksajerk's comment.
    in reply to Pentazoid111 (Show the comment)
  • Pentazoid111

    ""Is it possible ....?"

    ....And the answer would be technically yes, but practically no. There is no reason to assume equal innate capacity between the genders."

    From a part ofthe conclusion section of the paper Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics: A meta-analysis: "This meta-analysis provides further evidence that, on average,

    males and females differ very little in mathematics achievement,

    despite more positive math attitudes and affect among males ."You were saying?

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Pentazoid111's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Pentazoid111's comment.
    in reply to fringeelements (Show the comment)
  • Sam10947

    state expressly where my articulation fell below ordinary. state instead of assert. let's hear

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Sam10947's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Sam10947's comment.
    in reply to SuGaRuSh14 (Show the comment)
  • Sam10947

    what's a misogyny to you ? do u know what does it mean ? it means hatered of women, but i don't hate them ya fucking inbred pylonic shit for brain, i just say it like it is, if that disturbs your sleep at night u may wanna reassess your touch with reality. a comforting tought won't help u find the facts. u understand dingleberry ?

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Sam10947's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Sam10947's comment.
    in reply to SuGaRuSh14 (Show the comment)
  • Dubbidubdub

    My bad, brah. 

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Dubbidubdub's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Dubbidubdub's comment.
    in reply to ProDCloud (Show the comment)
  • ProDCloud

    He was talking about the mathematical section.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate ProDCloud's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate ProDCloud's comment.
    in reply to Dubbidubdub (Show the comment)
  • Dubbidubdub

    For some reason I read "math" as "any trait"; I probably wouldn't have wrote that comment had I read your comment correctly. But to be fair, we should only predict a different in group ability if their exists a difference is brain physiology corresponding to said ability.

    Men have relatively larger parietal lobes -- explain superior math.

    Women have a relatively larger corpus callosum and Broca's and Wernicke's areas -- explains superior communication abilities.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Dubbidubdub's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Dubbidubdub's comment.
    in reply to Dubbidubdub (Show the comment)
  • Loading comment...
Loading...
Loading...
Working...
Sign in to add this to Watch Later