Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Compare Silk'n & Tria Treatment Area

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
32,506
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 9, 2009

http://www.so-smooth.co.uk brings you Laser Hair Removal at Home. Why not join our blog
http://blog.so-smooth.co.uk
Compare the treatment area for both the Tria and Silk'n.

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (HomeLaserHairRemoval)

  • If you had 3 years to wait in between charges to finish your leg then the Tria would be on a pa with the silk'n. Well for one leg anyway. You'd then have to buy another Tria because the battery has run out.

    If you like living too much and want quick effective results, buy Silk'n.

  • so which one works better then the other? please reply

  • Silk'n!! Same strength but treatment is much much quicker due to larger treatment area. It's also £250 cheaper!

Top Comments

  • this is a rubbish compare

  • it dose not work. my test has been 8 month's a total fail. I'm thinking of selling the device

see all

All Comments (17)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Hey, it grows back as fast as shaving. My hair didn't shed with either device. I figured if the hair sheds at least I'm hair free for awhile but the hair never fell out so it's a complete waste of time.

  • @edokid so even though tria and silk'n arent permanent how long does it take for the hair to grow back with both of them?? and do they help you not get ingrown hairs X(??

  • @Room0501 The tria works on the long run. Its an actual laser so it does remove the hair permanently but it does take a longer time. The silk'n is nothing more than two bulbs and they are not strong enough to kill off the root of the hair like the tria. The tria is also smaller because it IS a laser. I have had laser treatments at the doctors and it is a long procedure. You can't get rid of hair permanently in a few weeks because the hair grows in different stages.

  • @geddon436 It takes around 6 sessions to be hair free. Depends on the area, underarms for example are around $60 per session so $360 in total. My full chest was $85 in total x 6 so $680 etc etc. Tria and Silk'n are not permanent and barely work at all.

  • @edokid How many sessions and how much did each cost to make you completely hair free? Are you hair free all over?

  • @DesendantOfAdam I'm white, skin type low 3. Had many professional laser treatments and pretty much hair free now. Silk'n did nothing though. Tria and Silk'n are NOT permanent.

  • whats ur complexion? r u black , white , indian or chinese?

  • @DesendantOfAdam It's called doing research. In order to permanently disable a hair folicle it has to be heated to around 127 degrees. No home device can do this because that power could burn a hole in your skin if used incorrectly. No home laser is powerful enough to permanently damage the hair, only disable it temporarily, so you always need to use it. I've owned the Silk'n it doesn't work at all.

  • are they permanent solutions? plz guide? and also is silkin fda approved?

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more