9/11 Researcher Jim Hoffman on Building Collapes

KC radio interview with noted 9/11 Researcher Jim Hoffman who states that the attacks were specifically engineered for "maximum psychological shock" in which the controlled demolitions played a key role. Hoffman also mentions inconsistencies in the 9/11 Commission Report, specifically the incorrect label of the massive steel cores of the twin towers as "hollow steel shafts". Hoffman closes with the statement: "All you need is common sense to see the official story is just invalid."

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Jim
• Hoffman
• 911
• Demolition
• of
• Twin
• Towers
• WTC
• 7

[Daddyo930]

@roquefortfiles The US government has lied to it's people in the past. There are numerous examples. If they lied in the past, why should anyone believe anything they have to say now?

[roquefortfiles]

@Daddyo930 What does that have to do with a plane going through a building and shot from 60 different view points?

Nothing!

[Daddyo930]

@roquefortfiles Has the US government ever lied to it's people before?

[roquefortfiles]

@Daddyo930 Defending what lies? How much of a fucking idiot do you have to be to see this event photographed and videotaped from God knows how many variable angles? A commercial jet SCREAM through the building?

Then you guys come on here and post all of this.."Oh can't fly that fast at that height" Bullshit.

It quite obviously CAN!!

If you think Government agents sit here trying to convince people of that?

You're not playing with a full deck.

[Daddyo930]

@roquefortfiles Then why do you even bother commenting? If you don't care about it, why are you here defending the lies? You already know the truth so why bother? Do you really love the country that much that you stay here and defend the lies night and day? Or is it that your a cointelpro operative working with a team of deadenders who's time is almost up?

[roquefortfiles]

@Daddyo930 I don't really care what you think. If you don't believe it that's your deal.  My friend is military trained and was a Capt for 30 years. You don't have the foggiest idea about what you are talking about and I am more than a little tired of listening to you lot on this topic.

Allot of brain dead drivel.

I guess it all never happened then did it?

Give your head a shake man!!

[Daddyo930]

@roquefortfiles Unless you can provide scientifically verified evidence of a 767 doing 420 or 510 knots at 700 feet, your wasting your time. A terrorist would not have the skill needed to pilot a 767 at that altitude and that speed. You can't do it in a simulator in a thousand times and there is no way the plane would have made it to the target before being destroyed by structural failure. We know who you are.

[roquefortfiles]

@Daddyo930 You're not confusing knots for MPH?

I don't exactly think some guy hell bent on running the plane in to a building is too concerned with the Boeing recommendations. Or spilling a drink.

And I got a 767 Capt and 60 randomly shot videos of United 175 to prove it.

[roquefortfiles]

@Daddyo930 Physics and aerodynamics says that a 767 cannot fly 420 or 510 knots at 700 feet.

You have no idea what you are talking about.

My buddy flies a 767. One day i asked him these silly stories. His quote to me.

"LOL. no altitude has nothing to do with it. I can fly the plane at full speed at 50 feet if i wanted to. the altitude has no bearing on the engine performance. The plane is very capable of those speeds"

[Daddyo930]

@roquefortfiles I notice that you have conveniently avoided the discussion of the plane speeds. Physics and aerodynamics. I trust those more than computers and the testimony of witnesses. Physics and aerodynamics says that a 767 cannot fly 420 or 510 knots at 700 feet. You will be unable to produce a scientifically verified instance of a 767 exceeding VMO by that much and being able to maintain control. The plane would have destroyed itself long before reaching any "targets".