re-upload: "Climate Deniers Love the 70s! -- The Remix" by greenman3610

if you like this, subscribe to him. also, his original upload of this video can be watched in high definition:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XB3S0fnOr0M

im re-uploading this mainly for 3 reasons:

- to support greenman3610s channel
http://www.youtube.com/user/greenman3610
subscribe to him.

- because i think the issue deserves more attention.

- because i still think the 911 truth movement is dead, but now global warming denial appears to be their next destination.

please rate and comment/discuss also on the original upload:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XB3S0fnOr0M

Category:

Education

Tags:

• greenman3610
• climate
• change
• global
• warming
• denial
• seventies
• science
• skepticism
• carbon
• dioxide
• CO2
• debunking
• 911
• truthers
• wearechange

[MissGreenslime]

@kurtilein3

Yes, he is a top particle physicist at CERN, and you are a cool dude who has met Amy Goodman. You are probably right.

Democracy Now is sponored by the Ford Foundation. They are really left wing.

LOL !!

[MissGreenslime]

@kurtilein3

Scientists are little wage slaves who do what they are told. Climate science is totally corrupt.

*

We portray peer review to the public as a quasi-sacred process that helps to make science our most objective truth teller. But we know that the system of peer review is biased, unjust, unaccountable, incomplete, easily fixed, often insulting, usually ignorant, occasionally foolish, and frequently wrong."

Richard Horton, editor of the British medical journal The Lancet,

[kurtilein3]

you underestimate the resilience of the peer-review process.

you also dont seem to be aware that science is a global thing. the UK government may claim whatever it wants, unless they submit it to peer review it just doesnt count. scientists around the planet know how to ignore everything that hasnt been published, they do it all the time. publish or die. you didnt publish? i dont talk to zombies.

once its published, scientists from japan or south africa can falsify it.

[kurtilein3]

you are confusing the scientific world with the world of politics.

reality doesnt change just because some politicians talk. scientists still observe the same reality, no matter how much bullshit politicians may spread.

carbon credits and carbon trading is, if done correctly (which the lobbyists fight hard) a possible solution. a carbon tax would be another solution, a solution that is much more difficult to corrupt than carbon trading.

[kurtilein3]

central media doesnt pretend to be scientific.

unlike pseudo-scientists, that SHOULD submit their ideas to peer-review in the form of research papers but WONT, corporate media (most times) doesnt claim to be scientific. but corporate media will never bring the discussion to the people without simplifying the topic beyond recognition, omitting important details that might be uncomfortable for one of their many big advertisers.

[xXAkridXx]

That's not the same as flat out denying it happened.

[kurtu5]

Actually the holocaust is very similar. The Jews seem to claim that only they suffered. China lost 10-20 million. 24 million for Russians. 62-78 million total.

But if you point this out, you are an antisemite.

[kurtu5]

>so they dont even attempt to convince any scientists. they directly approach ... the public.

You could say the same about central media. Rupert Murdock's empire brings the discussion to the people. At every turn the people are sold on global... climate change.

[kurtu5]

Carbon sequestration is a type of geoengineering.

Carbon is the boogey man de jour. And like you said, there is no talk about methane. And the consensus among the consensus is that even if we stopped carbon emissions, the problem will still exist.

Im my estimation, its a scam.

[MissGreenslime]

@kurtilein3

Margaret Thatcher (an extreme right wing politician) built the Hadley Centre to promote agw. The political history of AGW is almost completely British - Kyoto and Copenhagen were run by the British government.

Enron and BP strongly promoted Kyoto and the IETA l (emissions trading) lobbied for a Copenhagen deal. They represent the oil companies and banks.

Carbon credits and trading us what this is all about.