somebody wins everything ... what we have with john nash is everybody wins something .. nashes process is tactical for one on one .. but for complex systems .. the primordial game of life is the strategic choice.
this demo is the lightweight version .. but it does have a more industrial application which could be produced after some R&D - that uses a logical and original metaphysics to create an analogy and model with the colours, the structures and the events.
cf. logical atomism - russell, wittgenstein
thanks also to dr c sprott for his fractal images
three types of input can drive three specific types of output
e.g. for a politician what to underplay, overplay or plainly state in a political campaign - and each of these input strategies can drive 3 specific outcomes.
the correlation of frequency/colour to structure and function is introduced here
http://offtheplanet.blogspot.com/2011/04/key-to-new-golden-age.html
the actual game theory system is valid within the system of metaphysics I described as tripartite essentialism, 1991
Another aspect of this system not mentioned in the presentation is that because of all the high energy introductions the pattern eventually starts to dissolve - so that every now and then a re-imposition or restatement refreshment of the original pattern or some good version of it is required
the other long term issue with this game theory is that the pattern from time to time - the rules and social processes would have to be periodically refreshed ... the occasional sense of order
outshore 3 years ago
the culurs can be generally related to specific social functions by a system of metaphysics and three input types can be shown to drive three specific types of result from this model ...
well, who needs such control over complex realities anyway ... nice music though
outshore 3 years ago