Under Your Spell (Cover)
Loading...
2,319
Loading...
Uploader Comments (rachelbrune)
see all
All Comments (21)
-
i do agree; the vibrato does make the singer's mark on the song. she is taking a work that has been done already and putting her own stylistic touch to it. the song should be looked at independently, not as a comparison, i feel, and i really do like the way it was done. :)
as for the "chipmunks" comment: 1. review your grammar. 2. use a spellchecker. 3. really? -__-
-
sounds like the chipmunks dont echo to much and u would have it stop on and slow it down is not a very fast soung
-
simply great
-
Sniffle this was beautiful
-
thats just her voice
-
WOW wonderfull voice :-)
Loading...
I cried listening to this. And I don't cry. This is absolutely the most beautiful cover of this song that I can find, anywhere. Just gorgeous. And as far as the "chipmunk" comment goes...well we can't expect everyone to know what vibrato is (or how difficult it is!). PLEASE keep singing for us - you're exceptional.
drawing11220 9 months ago
@drawing11220 Dang... Thaniks!
rachelbrune 9 months ago
Thanks!
rachelbrune 1 year ago
Great! I notice everyone brings up the vibrato, actually I feel it makes it YOUR version, instead of just copying Amber Benson :)
KimOfDrac 2 years ago
Thanks! :D
rachelbrune 2 years ago
i would have to agree, a bit too much vibrato for this song. but your voice is very strong, and i must admit i loved when i could see you were just HAPPY to be singing.
whiskyvixen 2 years ago
yeah, knocking off the vibrato seems to be the consensus. :-D thanks for the comment!
rachelbrune 2 years ago