I got tired of my friends saying things like "Lol you and your theories" and "Omg you're obsessed with conspiracy theories". Theories this, theories that. Beliefs this, beliefs that. One word that never comes up is evidence. So I thought I'd make a video simply called "Evidence", loaded with documented facts.
Music: Marilyn Manson - Evidence (Instrumental)
Sources & Links:
http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2010/02/new-video-evidence.html
and then just tell them to go get another glass of Fluoride and watch the game on the tube..
SuperBigbadman 2 months ago
Give them one more theory, tell them you will be able to tell the future, and this future event you can tell them will be what "the mainstream media, will blame the next event on people like you" people who are "truthers", "Birther's" "Global Warming Deny"ers" JFK, MLK, RFK, etc. take you pick but the bottom line is when they set a Nuke off on U.S soil they will blame us for it...
SuperBigbadman 2 months ago
So nice to be in the conspiracy religion.
Join the club and pray 5 x a day to the holy chemtrail.
koertje 3 months ago
@ScootleRoyale too right, its bloody hard work convincing people of the bleeding obvious
thisisyourwakeup 3 months ago
@ScootleRoyale
Neither Jones nor Harrit have ever submitted their thermitic nonsense to ANY peer reviewed journal.
The one they DID submit the paper to, was a pay per publish vanity journal with no peer review and whose editor resigned when this came to light.
"These red chips aren't simply burning, they are undergoing a chemical reaction."
Burning IS a chemical reaction, moron.
No wonder you guys keep getting fooled by charlatans like Jones and Gage, you are hopelessly out of your depth.
FEMADEATHCAMPCONTROL 3 months ago
@FEMADEATHCAMPCONTROL Steven Jones has published close to 50 papers in his career and Neils Harrit has published close to 60. Jones says the nanothermite paper was the most rigorous peer-review he's ever had and Harrit says it's the best paper of his entire career. Just coz it wasn't in an establishment journal doesn't mean it wasn't thoroughly reviewed.
No paint will BURN. These red chips aren't simply burning, they are undergoing a chemical reaction. The difference is clear even in oxygen.
ScootleRoyale 3 months ago
@ScootleRoyale
"You don't need to ignite the chips with no oxygen to prove they are thermite."
Of course you dont.
But if you want to *prove* a thermitic reaction, then you do it an oxygen free environment.
Paint will ignite in air as will many other compounds, thermite doesnt require Oxygen.
FEMADEATHCAMPCONTROL 3 months ago
@ScootleRoyale
You clearly havent got the slightest idea about scientific peer review.
Maybe you think that scientists ALL OVER THE WORLD are paid off to keep quiet by GW BUSH.
God only knows what goes on in a twoofers brain.
FEMADEATHCAMPCONTROL 3 months ago
@ScootleRoyale
So S Jones wasnt brave enough to put forward his research to the worldwide scientific community, because he might have been ignored or humiliated or something?
He is proposing he has evidence the mass murder of 3000 people by his own govt, for fucks sake.
If he believed it, he would publish in every scientific journal he could.
FEMADEATHCAMPCONTROL 3 months ago
@FEMADEATHCAMPCONTROL The more "respectable" journals are pro-establishment and more concerned with how they are seen by the scientific community than they are with scientific truth. Group think and peer-pressure affects scientists too. The varying outputs in energy release is explained in the paper. An oxygen-free ignition is unneccesary. You don't need to ignite the chips with no oxygen to prove they are thermite. The fact that they undergo a thermite reaction is proof they are thermite!
ScootleRoyale 3 months ago