Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Change is Good

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
85,088
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 16, 2009

A certain president-elect ran on a platform of "change." Stuart Shepard considers how it's going so far.

  • likes, 22 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • What change.........All I see are all the Clinton used to bees and wanna bees again. God help us.

  • If you want a high position in the Obama administration, be sure you haven't paid your taxes through an "oversight" or "misunderstanding."

see all

All Comments (37)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I don't really understand this argument. Bill Clinton has not been in office since 2001. It makes the most logical and intuitive sense to assume Obama is referring to the the politicians during the time Bush was in office and the direction they took our country in.

    Also, changing back to these older politicians does not even intrinsically involve the renewal of their older policies. How would it?

  • I wonder if Obama takes tires off of one car puts them on another car and calls them "New Tires"? Hey, he "changed the tires!!!!

  • Did anyone notice the Fox News logo on his desk at about 10 secs in? Is Focus on the Family a religious or political organization??

  • great video, cute baby and you kind of look like Dave Folley!

  • Hellooooo, the change is from the Bush years, not the Clinton years people. Typical of Obama detractors to try to ignore historical facts! Our country was in excellent shape during the Clinton years. Look it up! Unemployment, economy, surplus, you name it. Under Bush, don't bother looking it up- you're living it! Obama doesn't pick his drinking buddies for the cabinet like the last guy. WAKE UP!

  • you have a cute baby. good video

  • Exactly.  This video unveils one dimension of the masterful illusions of a remarkable illusionist.

  • Since the economy and everything else under Clinton were great, it seems that O's nonchange approach is correct. The change is to Bush's destructive governance.

  • As usual, Mr. Shepard is not explaining exactly WHY utilizing many of Clinton's former administration is a bad thing. Give me some good, hard, concrete reasons why Bill Clinton was a bad president and what he did wrong other than "getting caught" being unfaithful to his wife.

  • Some things to note. The Clinton administration dealt The Bush Administration an enormous surplus, somewhere in the ball park of $5.6 Trillion. Yes, his advisers mentioned above are from the Clinton Adm. So what? Rober Gates (Secretary of Defense) is a republican. Oh and the one head of the Treasury, Timothy Geithner is a Moderate Republican. I don't understand the argument? Politics as usual? we will see

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more