As an addendum, even letters to the editors pointing out erroneous conclusions in scientific papers are not published if written by creationists. So much for going where ever the science takes you.
Its hard to prove a creationist point when all the rules are made by evolutionists - and the premise of evolution disallows any introduction of any evidence of supernaturalism.
But its not hard at all to put the pieces together of you ALLOW supernatural intervention or creation.
I've never suggested that these fakes disprove evolution - what I've said is that evolution has been so loose a science that fakes are welcome because they support the cause. The recent fiasco at Frankfurt U re C14 dating was, according to the chancellor, in large part because "many of the professors looked the other way" Why?
And claiming that evolutionists found the frauds is disingenuous - they caused the fraud, accepted the fraud, taught the fraud and finally admitted it? Sheesh!!
The photographically couldn't possibly show the same results, because he used the woodcut for one of the embryos (Human I think) in all the columns. I'd hope in this day that they wouldn't repeat this .
More importantly, although there is an appearance of similarity, ie frogs and man have digits, the development and genes responsible for them are radically different. So appearances can be deceiving.
It was Jay Gould who took NY schools to task for still having it in their texts.
You're quoting Di Pisa. many other people who spend considerable time at the site, including Earle Stanley Gardner, the District Attorney for Los Angeles and of whom it was said never uttered an untrue word. may newspaper reports were filed all supporting the digs.
Another dig in undisturbed soil by the Mexican govt produced more, that are currently on display in Acambero, also dated to 6000 years.
First of all, the paper was not peer reviewed. Secondly, Di Piso was accused by another anthropologist who worked with him of bending facts to suit his beliefs, and in a scientific report no less. The TL lab only repudiated their dating after they were aware of the implications, the C14 stands.
You need to do some research about the many cultures that have artifacts AND cultural evidences about coexistance. Ica Burial Stones?
i like that at the end. a V production. Thats bad ass right there
StokesDaddy 11 months ago
You can read whatever you want in the Bible.
RadarKat73080 1 year ago
And more than a few debunking the bad science of evolution as well. ;-)
happylada 2 years ago
As an addendum, even letters to the editors pointing out erroneous conclusions in scientific papers are not published if written by creationists. So much for going where ever the science takes you.
Its hard to prove a creationist point when all the rules are made by evolutionists - and the premise of evolution disallows any introduction of any evidence of supernaturalism.
But its not hard at all to put the pieces together of you ALLOW supernatural intervention or creation.
happylada 2 years ago
I've never suggested that these fakes disprove evolution - what I've said is that evolution has been so loose a science that fakes are welcome because they support the cause. The recent fiasco at Frankfurt U re C14 dating was, according to the chancellor, in large part because "many of the professors looked the other way" Why?
And claiming that evolutionists found the frauds is disingenuous - they caused the fraud, accepted the fraud, taught the fraud and finally admitted it? Sheesh!!
happylada 2 years ago
The photographically couldn't possibly show the same results, because he used the woodcut for one of the embryos (Human I think) in all the columns. I'd hope in this day that they wouldn't repeat this .
More importantly, although there is an appearance of similarity, ie frogs and man have digits, the development and genes responsible for them are radically different. So appearances can be deceiving.
It was Jay Gould who took NY schools to task for still having it in their texts.
happylada 2 years ago
You're quoting Di Pisa. many other people who spend considerable time at the site, including Earle Stanley Gardner, the District Attorney for Los Angeles and of whom it was said never uttered an untrue word. may newspaper reports were filed all supporting the digs.
Another dig in undisturbed soil by the Mexican govt produced more, that are currently on display in Acambero, also dated to 6000 years.
happylada 2 years ago
First of all, the paper was not peer reviewed. Secondly, Di Piso was accused by another anthropologist who worked with him of bending facts to suit his beliefs, and in a scientific report no less. The TL lab only repudiated their dating after they were aware of the implications, the C14 stands.
You need to do some research about the many cultures that have artifacts AND cultural evidences about coexistance. Ica Burial Stones?
happylada 2 years ago
So Nebraska man was never accepted by Evolutionists?
happylada 2 years ago