Wingless Wonders
Top Comments
All Comments (221)
-
Found the channel wing which still haa potential
-
the B-58 has no tail wings, sorry
-
@40390576 I hate south park i watch discovery channel, and i noticed you have an upper case "your" so assume your referring to my "ur", well my grammar has no direct link to my intelligence and and i apologize for my immature humour it happens on rare occasions
-
@archon808 fine a fuckin massive flying areofoil
-
The last one claims a larger model could carry 4000 passengers. LOL! It would take like 8 hours to get all the passengers off the plane after it landed. It would have to be as big as a football field. You could crash it into a building,... and keep going!!!
-
Flying Flounder must have had a real torque problem w/ such short "wings". Not much roll control leverage. Actually, it's a blended wing body.
-
@destructOzap yeh, a flying wing, like the b-2 stelth bomber
-
@cprich22 wingless ?
im german they are called " nur-flügel-flugzeuge " , what means : only-wing-plane
-
No wings huh? Sure. Kind of like saying a short stubby fat person has no legs.
@zebadee277
So, you're saying that American's, the Allies, and the rest of the civilized world would have been served better had America just disregarded the actions of the Axis and simply never joined the war, even when the war rolled over Washington? Explain, exactly what America should have done.
This, I have to hear.
TheJediCharles 7 months ago 5
@cprich22 This is clearly a lifting body, not a flying wing
archon808 5 months ago 3