the first premise is a contradiction in terms: you've gotta be a thorough going idiot to define "objectivity" as independent of any person's opinion, etc., and then make a 180 turn and claim it depends on the person of God! if morality depends on God, then it's subjective by Craig's own definition of objectivity. the fact that Craig can't see that and repeat this stupid arg in every debate just shows that religion causes brain death, especially when one has lived with the God delusion since 16
the first premise is a contradiction in terms: you've gotta be a thorough going idiot to define "objectivity" as independent of any person's opinion, etc., and then make a 180 turn and claim it depends on the person of God! if morality depends on God, then it's subjective by Craig's own definition of objectivity. the fact that Craig can't see that and repeat this stupid arg in every debate just shows that religion causes brain death, especially when one has lived with the God delusion since 16
AgeOfReasonXXI 1 year ago
Because it is a non argument.
The second premise cannot be established.
drcraigdefeated 2 years ago
Why does the Moral argument always ZOOM over Atheist's head?
abrimestome 2 years ago