"Michael Schumacher is the greatest all-round driver in Formula1 history" - David Coulthard
Uploader Comments (BarneveldDarts)
Top Comments
-
sorry man Senna was like a kid, always complaining and arguing with everyone, he's fast, but not too fast. He had passion for pole position to show how fast he is, he kept forgetting about the fuel tactics and was loosing races. Shumy is smart, he's a proper racer. Shumy's got the edge, check again. Analyse better :)
All Comments (85)
-
You have to say that during his time, Schumacher was the best in the sport (in the Ferrari period), but I reckon if he had lived in a different era, someone like Coulthard could've become WC. In the early partnership between himself and Mika, ('98 for example) a lot of the times he was beating his team mate, but team orders, and other bad luck allowed Mika to become double world champ. I have a lot of respect for David. He undoubtedly raced against the best, and at times came out on top.
-
Kids, all I can say, Piquet is enough to humiliate MS watch?v=VCOpOQ50uoY (In 1990, with the crap Benetton B190, won 2 races, ahead of the 2 Ferraris (best car of '90 with Prost and Mansell), the McLaren (Berger) and the 2 Williams (Boutsen and Patrese) and finished 3rd on the championship. Or try this: watch?v=z6HixXpf9Ns (Not mentioning 1991, in retirement, Piquet 3 x MS 2). THIS IS FORMULA ONE, KIDS: watch?v=hMfQ08ZfJsg Schumacher? MAKES ME LAUGH
-
@Talaramama that's right man ur smart, the senna fans are annoying under every schumi vid they have to say senna is d best ever(which he isn't schumi,prost,fangio are all better)
-
@kiddingboy128 Coulthard??? AlesI? Hakkinen? no way... I'd say Stewart, Clark, Rindt, Villenueve ...
-
@kiddingboy128 I would replace Alonso with Vettel :>
-
@Talaramama Senna had the heart and the passion ! Schumacher the precision ... Both were awesome drivers. But I still think Schumacher is better ( not because Im German ). It's because he was the only one who was able to keep up with Senna with the manual gearbox. ( in a weaker car ). He has done incredible things , he doesn't have to proof anymore.
-
@BarneveldDarts Statistically Shcumarcher is better yes, to watch i prefer senna especially in the turbo era. i grew up watching schumi and i think he is a fantastic driver as i think senna, prost, mansell, gilles all amazing to watch. personally i rather senna. but right now in 2011 i'm routing for schumarcher. he deserves to win he reset the standards for modern f1 drivers. both are/were spectacular to watch. forget about stats they only determine a winner in a season....nothing else
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Senna was the best driver. Senna was the rain master. Senna was the Monaco master. 6th time winner in Monaco. He even won with this crap Lotus in 1987. Schumacher won only 2 times even he had always Ross Brawn made the best cars. Schumacher is not even close that standard. Senna's ambiotion into F1 was so high that he sacrifise his own life for that.
zikzak97 8 months ago
@zikzak97 schumacher 7 times world champion, 91 wins! schumi won more races in the rain without tractoin control then anybody else! yes in monace good joke, where pole position mean that you as good as won the grand prix! and because senna had the fastest car in that time, no wonder! schumacher won not 2 times he won 5 times monace grand prix!!! get your facts right before you write such a stupid comment! i bet u r around 20 years old...
BarneveldDarts 8 months ago 18