Interview with Henry "Hank" Skinner

Henry "Hank" Watkins Skinner, 47, from the Texas Department of Criminal Justice's death row at the Polunsky Unit in Livingston Convicted in 1995 of murdering his girlfriend and her two sons, the state has scheduled Skinner's execution for February 24. Skinner maintains he is innocent, and for 15 years he has asked the state to release DNA evidence he says will prove he was not the killer. Interview date: Wed., Jan. 20, 2010

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Henry
• Hank
• Skinner
• death
• row

[mukiadean7]

Now this is what you call a white nigger....if he was black ya'll racist bitches would be talkin shit...its not our fault u carry lice like luggage...jealous mf's hehehee!!!!

[choppedpeanuts2]

@ourtortsystem They've had 17 years worth of "second looks" LOL. The evid. is in the possession of the court clerk, the DA, and a lab. Perry has no authority over them.

[choppedpeanuts2]

@ourtortsystem Atty is an abbreviation, fool. Deprave? Is that your "parlance"? LOL! And you are lying about what Comer said. Why doesn't that surprise me? He said if he had to do it over again, he still wd not have requested testing. He never said additional testing would be exculpatory, since it is both a factual and legal impossibility.

[choppedpeanuts2]

@ourtortsystem He got a fair trial. Stop lying. You're yapping about rights you know nothing about. You've never read any of the court opinions or briefs, though I doubt you would be able to understand them. A thinker, you clearly are not.

[choppedpeanuts2]

@ourtortsystem You MUST be from Uranus! LOL. Of course, you are lying - repeatedly. He got a fair trial. Why you think you are smarter than the numerous judges who have reviewed the case makes you look like a loon. The courts have had enough of this loon playing the system. And it is you, not me, who wants the triple murderer to avoid his just sentence.

[choppedpeanuts2]

@ourtortsystem Hahaha! You know nothing. Or, are you claiming that you know more than the TCCA, the USDC, the 5th Circuit Ct of Appeal, and the USSC? You're dishonest and delusional.

[choppedpeanuts2]

@ourtortsystem The standard is beyond a reasonable doubt. He's had a fair trial and 17 years of appellate review. Stop pretending you care about justice when it is clear that you don't. You're anti-justice and a lover of a thugs who murdered 3 people.

[choppedpeanuts2]

@ourtortsystem Skinner told the police he woke up before Twila came home and saw that she had taken his last bottle of booze to the party. His so saw called expert also testified that skinner shouldn't have been able to run 4 blocks, break into a trailer, stay awake until the police knocked on the door 3 hrs later, run and hide in a closet in another room, read & correct a typo in a waiver he signed, etc. You know nothing about the evidence but yet you yap about reasonable doubt. Get a clue.

[ourtortsystem]

@choppedpeanuts2

I know enough to conclude that Hank's constitutional rights have been violated.

I'm not trying to fool anyone.

His prosecutor has a vested interest in suppressing the evidence and not handing ot over to the defence: if it proves that there aws a third party it will make the prosecutor look unprofessional and he might even face the eithics committee.

[ourtortsystem]

@choppedpeanuts2

his "atty", using your parlance, admitted he made a mistake about not having the tests done. He has since changed his mind, he says the evidence could be exculparory.

You cannot deprave a person of his life because of his lawyer's mistake. That IS deranged and crual