Part 9 Atheism VS Theism - Where does the evidence point?

Fine Debate between two able speakers on the existence of God

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• William
• Lane
• Craig
• Apologetics
• Christian
• debate
• atheist

[13shadowwolf]

Once again, theistic claims fall apart when examined.

[madichelp0]

9:34 Facepalm to the left ; )

[Sakib241]

Craig doesn`t believe in GOD. He is just making money of gullible Christians.

[TheGrahamBrechin]

He sounds like an evangelist.

I keep wanting to shout out - "AAAMEN" - every two minutes.

Is it Craig or Kregg ?? discuss

[godisadelusion16]

wow this is 1 of the best debates i have seen in awhile... for once the theist is not a complete fool... but he is still a theist lol

[bestinfadel]

the atheist only seems to be defending his personal views

[friendofthefunk]

God is real for me, therefore God is real? What an idiot. Doesn't he realize that following that logic would make everything everyone believes real?

[Homie0static]

I would have to say that Craig won this debate. I will say that I have seen stronger theistic arguments made by Condell, Karina, Hitchens and Ed Brown that would make Craig really have to work. All the same, out of all the Theistic proponents I have seen Craig is tops.

[zoen23]

I've got to be honest, even if Mr. Craig was not a theist, I still wouldn't like him. He appears to be not only arrogant but also very rude to Mr. Slezak.

[behemuth]

lol why JUST the universe? considering how grand the universe is, what we could have, could be a lot less substantial.

[behemuth]

@mastermetal777 ... theories are not facts by definition... though you seam to think so... what refute scientific theories are better theories or even validated facts, not theology.

[mastermetal777]

I truly like how atheists trust science to help them hold true to their ideas. The reality is that science has, time and again, been refuted and disproved (though not in all subjects so as not to cause heavy backlash). Dozens of scientific theories have been disproved because their either incorrect or inconsistent. How can you trust theories better than the absolute facts when the facts have been proven to the point where it is what it is, and nothing more?