War of the Worlds game - Human Victory
Top Comments
All Comments (56)
-
Today is a proud day for Britain and indeed the earth. Well done. Report back to base for tea and crumpets.
-
@pathofchaos1 That makes sense.
-
@DARKHUNTER130 That sounds logical.
-
@DasMoog That's smart.
-
@weldonwin What?! Were are these sequels I NEED to read them!
-
@philipbabb It's better to take out the big lads first because while your burning the weaker armies, the stronger nations are given more time to prepare and mount a stronger resistance than if they were crushed first. If there was a tank and a dude with a pistol who would you take out first?
-
@EPsuperFan Actually there ARE sequels, in which Mars is conquered by The Queen's Own Electric Fuseliers and Britian goes on to conquere the rest of the solar system
-
@TheGuardianofAzarath It should mine did. some times the ground and sound go out of sync or bug.
-
@philipbabb Englad is off by its self it would be nearly impossible to get aid during that time. Aid in enough numbers. Now lets say they landed in china? well lets see they could go to other countries and get help.. While england boats would have to cross the english channel which the martians could destroy easily.
-
@philipbabb arrogance on the part of the martians they belived that they could easily destroy britain as during the time the book and game is set britain could claim to be the center of the world in sheer size and economic and military prowess. Also the martian game would have been a bit boring using fighting machines against dudes with spears lol
Wrong. The game is set in 1898, where London was the centre of the economic world and the British Empire was the strongest nation in the world.
plummad 2 years ago 33
Couldn't the Martians have started their attack in an other part of the world, one where humans have less advanced military technology. They could have gained more ground sooner in the invasion thus maintaining a stronger colonial economy.
philipbabb 3 years ago 14