Yes, Carle is there, but Morrow's foot/leg is interfering with Nabokov too. Morrow isn't even stopping in a conventional manner. When you stop with your left foot forward, you use inner edge of your left skate and your outer edge of your right skate. Morrow was trying to stop with the INNER edge of his right skate and his skate was moving forward. That's a kicking motion.
Wow, Dallas fans, how much clearer do you want it? His foot is moving forward. The puck is pushed by his foot into the net. That is a kick by definition. Intent is not included here. It was an excellent call, and I say that without bias.
I'm neither a fan of the sharks or stars as you can clearly see by my screen name, but that should have been called a goal. I reviewed this video 10 times already and he clearly didn't kick it in nore was he looking down while the puck hit his skate. No i understand shark fans defending this no goal, which any diehard fan would do, hell I would to, but the Sharks got away with one on that goal.
It wouldn't be interference with Carle nudging Morrow from behind before contact. and someone wanted to talk about the no-call of unsportsmanlike conduct on morrow? what about the no call of Rivet's OBVIOUS crosscheck on the second 'no goal'?
brendan morrow is so funny wit the hand gesture! lol!
Sportsfan235 3 years ago
Yes, Carle is there, but Morrow's foot/leg is interfering with Nabokov too. Morrow isn't even stopping in a conventional manner. When you stop with your left foot forward, you use inner edge of your left skate and your outer edge of your right skate. Morrow was trying to stop with the INNER edge of his right skate and his skate was moving forward. That's a kicking motion.
cjl182 3 years ago
and ur an even bigger dumbshit because it was the sharks dude who was interfering with nabukov.
slapsh0t77 3 years ago
who won the series dumbshit?
slapsh0t77 3 years ago
No distinct kicking motion- period. Morrow didn't even see the puck until it was in the goal.
jsx48mlm 3 years ago
moot
netjunkie9 3 years ago
Shut up ineffablejeff. just because some sharks believe its a goal doesnt mean that all fans believe that. i no, i'm a sharks fan.
bariberhane 3 years ago
Wow, Dallas fans, how much clearer do you want it? His foot is moving forward. The puck is pushed by his foot into the net. That is a kick by definition. Intent is not included here. It was an excellent call, and I say that without bias.
NightHawk11and81 3 years ago
I'm neither a fan of the sharks or stars as you can clearly see by my screen name, but that should have been called a goal. I reviewed this video 10 times already and he clearly didn't kick it in nore was he looking down while the puck hit his skate. No i understand shark fans defending this no goal, which any diehard fan would do, hell I would to, but the Sharks got away with one on that goal.
SteelCity1981 3 years ago
It wouldn't be interference with Carle nudging Morrow from behind before contact. and someone wanted to talk about the no-call of unsportsmanlike conduct on morrow? what about the no call of Rivet's OBVIOUS crosscheck on the second 'no goal'?
hahasweeneyhaha 3 years ago