中美於南中國海衝突 - 張德民

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
746 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 10, 2009

美就海軍船隻 3/8 被騷擾 向中國提出抗議美國海軍船隻 無缺號 Impeccable 在南中國海進行探測掛有中國旗的中國船前來約 25 feet 進行騷擾. 據說中國船員脫掉衣服只剩內衣挑釁騷擾. 美國船員則用水柱反擊. 美國認為海軍船隻是在國際水域作業, 但是中國認為那是中國領土範圍. http://www.ccen.us 華聯電子報

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (9)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • let's suppose that the Communists had been pressured into accepting Tibetan independence much like how Jiang Kaishek is forced by Russia to accept Mongolia's cessation from China and Qing empire being pressured to cede outer manchuria to Russia. Then very swiftly there will be riots all over china and a general revolution against the communists.

  • The communists were keen to not repeat this mistake. Mao fitted himself with the role of an hardcore anti-imperialist and it won him a shit load of support. The current government is keeping the same policy. Jiang Zemin's unpopular because he had a conciliatory( but practical) tone with the West. Hu Jintao in comparison is more popular because he always put himself in line with chinese nationalistic thinking. The actual source of support for Communists is they kept china from being bullied.

  • actually lookyeahhohon, the only thing that's keeping CCP alive is nationalism, the economy is of course is just one indicator people use to judge the CCP. China have been so thoroughly bullied and subjugated by foreign imperialist countries in the last 2 hundred years that what the people really care about is if its government can stand up to foreign countries. The Qing empire and the Chinese nationalists had a policy of appeasement and it led to their loss of support and their overthrow.

  • international law prohits illegal activity on another nation's EEC. There's no argument at all over territorial water or not, the argument is over whether U.S activities is legal or not. To China, spying on its military base is not legal. To U.S, apparently that's legal( but of course as long as its not other countries spying on U.S bases).

  • Territorial Waters is anything less than 22KM away from any permanent land.

    So NO.

  • China has been tolerant? They have had numorous skirmishes against neighbors, building up its military, and are completely intolerant at Any US presence near by.

  • it doesnt matter where it was, even if the US troops landed on our soil, the government would still stick to the policy of relentlessly tolerating all kinds of invasion. this is because no country in this world take developing economy more seriously than China. offending even just a small nation like philipines will have an impact on trading other asian countries. most people dont understand why China has been so tolerant. it all comes down to economy which is the only thing that keeps CCP alive

  • u pointed to south china sea but the incident occured 75 miles away from Hainan which is clearly in chinese territory.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more