Thunder00t 's An Outdated Heritage From The 19th Century

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
298 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Ratings have been disabled for this video.

Uploaded by on Jun 19, 2011

The Dirty Methods Of Evolutionists - FOSSIL FORGERY


APE JAW ON A HUMAN SKULL.
When evolutionists were unable to find even a single fossil to verify their theory, they took recourse to fraud. The "Piltdown Man" fossil, which was produced by mounting a human skull onto an orangutan jaw and deceived the world of science for 40 years, was the most notorious of these frauds. In 1912, Charles Dawson, an amateur paleontologist, came forth with the claim that he found a jawbone and a cranial fragment in a pit near Piltdown, England. Although the jawbone resembled to an ape's, the teeth and the skull were human-like.




These specimens were called the "Piltdown Man" and were alleged to be 500 thousand years old. The reconstructions of Piltdown Man were made and they were displayed as conclusive evidence of human evolution in various museums. For more than 40 years, many scientific articles were written, and many interpretations and drawings were made about the Piltdown Man. It was only in 1953 when the fossil was understood to be a forgery as a result of detailed examinations performed on it. The skull belonged to a 500-year-old man, and the jawbone to a recently dead ape. The teeth were thereafter added in order to make the skull resemble to that of a man, and the joints were filed. Then all the pieces were stained with potassium dichromate to make them look old.

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • You really don't know atheism or science or history for that matter.

Video Responses

This video is a response to Muslim Punches Photographer: Not Charged!
see all

All Comments (10)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • you show me god , and i will ask you who or what made it . if you tell me that people can only exist if there is a creator . if you insist in a system that needs a creator , and use the lack of prebigbang theories as a critical flaw , then equally the lack of a being that created your god , is an equally critical flaw.

  • @NewCure4Atheism. Why upload something you have such strong beliefs for, and give it such a title that would draw attention, yet when the attention you're after is, frankly, what you should have damn well expected, you block the 'thumbs up/down' option, not only to the video itself, but to other people's comment. Stand for what you believe in and appreciate that Youtube-opia is a land of free speech. I don't agree with you, but by moderating to this degree, those who do won't follow you either.

  • this guy loves talking but he's just got the usual mumbo jumbo really

  • And then the athiest asks, "So how come if your God divulged all these wonderful insights into the workings of the universe why wasn't it muslim scholars building telescopes and forming relativity theories? Your attempt to hijack the hard work and dedication of real scientists is actually quite offensive."

    Here's a tip, don't argue, just continue talking bollocks.

  • Well, this video is complete and utter shit.

  • good video

  • You really have no idea what you are talking about the beginning of the universe is not the big bang, no scientist says this, the Big Bang is not the beginning of the universe, it is the explanation for the expansion of the known universe... also you should know that the Greeks knew most of this before the Quran was written. It's called math and geometry and astronomical observation. The Greeks knew before Allah?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more