Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Irrefutable Proof of Evolution- Part 1 (mtDNA, ERVs, Fusion)

YouTube is hiring engineers. Do you have programming skills and an interest in working on innovative web applications? Apply today.
YouTube Announcement
EXPAND ME Irrefutable proof of evolution, along with their 'rebuttals'. ERV human chromosome 2 neanderthal mtDNA DNA summation. Yes, Im using the term proof. If this raises your eyebrows, you ...  
 
Customize

More From: DonExodus2

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
This is a video response to Richard Dawkins - "What if you're wrong?"
1,941 ratings
Sign in to rate
82,338 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (5,941)   Options

Loading...
AsTheDaysOfNoahWere (3 hours ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Richard Dawkins PROVES beyond a doubt that evolution is 100% accurate. Watch this new discovery he has made. It is totally unbelievable!


watch?v=zaKryi3605g
GodisAmazing15 (9 hours ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Duh the pictures of Jesus are fiction! No one but his contemporaries and Paul (Who saw him on the road to damascus, if you read the Actsit makes sense,) In fact we are not supposed to draw pictures of him, but people tend to want a face to a person. Archaeopteryx has the bones of a bird. Not like a reptile. And people faked the bones in an attempt to proove evolution. Question for you: What if you are wrong about this? What if there is a God?
aozf05 (10 hours ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
So what's your point? So what if fossils have been faked in the past? Scientists discovered they were fake. That's science doing its job.

Once again, only Creationists don't think Archaeopteryx is a transitional fossil. They go so far as to claim that scientists no longer think so either.

And saying pictures of archaeopteryx are fiction is like saying pictures of Jesus are fiction. Of course we don't know what either of them looked like but what difference does that make on the argument?
GodisAmazing15 (11 hours ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
And Evolution has had 'fossils' to be found fake and not real.
GodisAmazing15 (11 hours ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Look it up, I did not spend the majority of my life studying both sides and other religeons. Quite frankly it was an evolutionist who came up with it. And it does try to describe the lack of evidence. And, you remember Archeaoptirix? It is now no longer being refered to as a missing link due to the fact that it is a bird. And the pictures, are simply fiction we dont know what color it was, what it really did look like, only the skeleton.
aozf05 (11 hours ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
We have thousands of transitional fossils. But Creationists don't consider them transitional fossils because they expect crocoducks and catdogs.

As for punctuated equilibrium, you don't seem to know what it is or how it works. I suggest you watch DonExodus2's video called

Punctuated Equilibrium and Creationist Dishonesty
GodisAmazing15 (14 hours ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
If by transistional you mean one organism to another, we do not see any proof for that. Ever heard of Punctuated Equilibreum? Excuse my poor spelling, it is not my strong point in writing. Punctuated Equilibreum tries to cover why there is a lack of transitional forms.
GodisAmazing15 (14 hours ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I have read over and over again about the Big Bang theory, and it does indeed weather you like it or not say that something came from nothing, and exploded becoming and organized everything. and in that a simple single cell organism evolved into what we can see today.
darkness88ew (1 day ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Thank you. I myself an am atheist, and I just could never see any necessary disconect between science, and evolution in particular, with religion. As long as you read much of it as metaphor, there is plenty of room for science.
steve00z24 (1 day ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
God has always been...energy has always been. God is everywhere...energy is everywhere. Could the "energy" that you are talking about, be the God that the Bible is talking about. SInce it always is, always was. Energy is the same yesterday, today and forevermore (Jesus is stated to be the same yesterday, today, and forever in the book of Hebrews 13:8) I'm a Christian and dont think science is a false religion. I see at a way that God allows His creation to learn more about Him and His Creation.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.