Rebuttal to "CrEvo Rant # 213: Creationists are Scientists Too"

This is a rebuttal to one of Ian Juby's videos. He can be found at wazooloo ( http://www.youtube.com/user/wazooloo ). The video I am rebutting is entitled CrEvo Rant # Rant # 213 ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gsrd3y0YooI ). I point out basic mistakes that Mr. Juby has made in his video.

I do not read the comments posted on my videos. If you would like to discuss any aspect of my video with me you can leave me a comment on my channel, send me a private message, or leave me a message here ( http://forums.leagueofreason.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=25&t=5996 ). I will respond to all those.

I'm citing "Fair Use" under US Copyright Act, Title 17 512 (g)(f), specifically those clauses covering Comment and Criticism, as well as the DMCA.
http://www.aclunc.org/issues/technolo...
Also "Fair Dealing" under UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 c.48, Part 1(Copyright) Section 79.4a
http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1988/...
Censorship is NOT a valid argument.

Resources:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flat_Earth_Society
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_authority

Category:

Education

Tags:

• evolution
• young
• earth
• creationists
• creation
• creationism
• YEC
• pseudoscience
• wazooloo
• Ian
• Juby
• fake
• science
• scientist
• argument
• from
• authority
• flat
• society

[JPO1618]

Great video. I have been watching wazooloo with caution and pwnage in mind since I have been on youtube. Maybe this has inspired a future video.

Sadly, I live in the riding of Gary Goodyear. Moved into it a few years ago. When I first read this story I thought WTF! Seriously! Like Harper needed to give me more reasons to dislike him, and he names a creatard minister of science and tech! I`m just waiting to ask him some questions come next election time...

[jebus6kryst]

Thanks.

I hope you give him hell during the next election.

[finditherefirst]

lame video dude...

[Ronilowich]

@alcolyte76 " LOL evilution IS NOT a fact hence the continued title... "theory" "

You do know that a scientific theory is the best model for explaining observed facts and that it will lose it's status if it's contradicted by even a single fact, right?

And what is the definition of a kind anyway?

[alcolyte76]

LOL evilution IS NOT a fact hence the continued title... "theory" dim wits go on preaching lies saying it is a fact.... so brainwashed to even try to say it's true... you have confused the issue at hand here, macro evilution/darwins theory of common descent is total rubbish not "micro" evilution wich is another way to say variation in kinds... what a total waste of time and space on youtube... total garbage lol

[phillippepe]

... gravity, size, and shape of earth have a lot to do with evolution. The envirement (a.k.a. the earth) helps guide evolution. The more gravity you have the shorter and bulkier things are, the less gravity the taller and thinner things are. You touch on many subjects. I sujjest you take this off and split it up into many vids.

[Faustaao]

@LabergeF Literally everything you just said is stupid. Pick up a basic biology textbook.

[NorthForkFisherman]

@LabergeF WTF are you talking about? Pick one subject and follow that line of thinking. Let's look at the last one: What's Au. afarensis AL 288-1 (Lucy) got to do with this video?

[Eaglewing17]

Haha "evolution is not a fact"- stamp comes up, wrong! Interuption as always

[LabergeF]

plz explain then how evolution wouldnt kill you after a period of time since evolution (mutation) leads to a loss of information wich after a period of time it would kill you (pure common sense huh?) and if evolution is correct then plz tell me why we still find dinosaur tracks with human tracks in them, also you probably know about that famous lucy, tell me do you really think that having found around 6 bones of a skeleton can automatically lead you to the conclusion that it was a female half

[crocaduck]

I agree that even though all the scientists who believe in creationism do good science, there is no real creationist research done by them. I think the bottom line point is; where is the credible research or the peer-reviewed research? Goodyear could be a flat-earther and still be a science and tech minister?

Yea, there is no debate (not in the scientific community). And theories are not decided on by lame talkshow debates… especially evolution.

Great rebuttal!