Moby Talks About The Firebird X
Top Comments
All Comments (130)
-
that guitar does have its purposes in experimental stuff but in playin normal blues, country , rock, metal classic rock or jazz or that kinda stuff i dont think it would serve too well
-
@dandemon1989 QUICK BEFORE IT LAYS EGGS!!!!
-
I think it says a lot that they couldn't get a guitarist to demo/endorse it...
-
come over to larrycrane dotcom and i'll show what a gibson guitar should be... my 66 and 68 sg
-
I really dont think they are taking the guitar to a higher more innovative level at all with these built in sounds. A guitar should only do 1 part of the work. Of course the human aspect BUT the amp is the thing that makes the guitar pop and blow you mind. The combined warmth of the guitar in an awesome amp is pure magic. Making your amp sound the way YOU want it to, making it personal. Not some shitty pre-sets in the guitar. Sorry, really not liking the "Robot-guitars" at all dudes.
-
Gibson is all about money and look what greed has gotten them. An ugly overpriced guitar. I'll stick with Fender.
-
Kind of an odd duck for a guitar demo but the guitar is revolutionary tool for pros who are tired of lugging useless pointless pedals around and being stuck with those sounds. People are afraid of change w/e... I refuse to buy pedals unless they are volume or wah wah pedals now. What I think people are afraid of the most is the fact that they think the guitar is doing all the work and taking the human aspect away. Well not true it still requires the same skill to play as a normal guitar - tuning
-
I don't like the idea of not having a pedalboard anymore. These effects sound way too shitty.
KILL THE FIREBIRD X
dandemon1989 4 months ago 37
This guitar looks uglier than Moby...
Scooterblue1 4 months ago 22