Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Rising Damp

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
988 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 23, 2009

In this exclusive NBS Learning Channels clip from http://www.thenbs.com, author, bricklayer and former university lecturer, Jeff Howell, and RICS damp expert Stephen Boniface explain why they believe true rising damp does not exist and also why chemically-injected damp proof courses (DPCs) should be kept at arm's length.

RICS damp expert Stephen Boniface defines the commonly accepted definition of rising damp before both he and fellow guest, Jeff Howell, claim 'true' rising damp doesn't exist.

Construction lecturer turned author, Howell, cites his years of research and experimentation as evidence. He also questions the need for DPCs and claims chemically-injected ones are a 'complete waste of time'.

The programme concludes that while rising damp is at best exceedingly rare, dampness in homes is a serious problem. The BRE methodology for testing for damp is illustrated, as is a discussion about the most likely causes of damp.

Read more about NBS Learning Channels: http://www.thenbs.com/LearningChannels

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (0)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more