These demonstrations were great, for they made the theocratic leaders in Salt Lake City realize that there was a price to pay for their pushing hatred against other Americans. There need to be more demonstration of this nature to push that point home.
@MIS315 Of course you would shoot of your mouth about this and automatically assume it was a religious statistic meant to deceive but you are wrong. When I get back ill supply all the figures and source and then you can judge for yourself.
@llewellleo ...of the workforce. It seems youve managed to warp your mind into being convinced the fashion industry is a conspiracy to demonize heterosexuals. Those gay designers do NOT innovate trends; they emulate archetypes that heterosexuals already ascribe to. Women don't give a damn about being postergirls for gay fashion, they care about aesthetically pleasing ungrateful demanding high-expectant STRAIGHT men, who happen to have more of an influence on their wardrobes than any gay man.
@llewellleo I dont know how you intend to "understand a culture" by investigating a single venue. Contrary to what you've seen on Entertainment Weekly or nexttopmodel, the gay community is NOT centralized in one stereotyped venue as you seem to believe. They are everywhere; it just so happens fashion is a branch that deploys and warrants pizzaze and finesse, and naturally as it is regularly televised and publicly deployed, it is what you've been informed of. Gays are localized in every branch...
@llewellleo And this is the last time I will address the fashion industry, for your personal hangups really don't validate the argument as credible. Personally, I have no affiliation to fashion because I see it as an exploitative industry and want no part of it, to me it is nothing more than frivolity. You speak of the GAY COMMUNITY promoting unrealistic standards? There are so many fallacies to this argument I really dont know where to begin or whether to even address them.but I'll at least try
@llewellleo ...infants is outrageous! A travesty! A travesty to what?? Convention??? The path of the bible? This just in (and I'd pay attention to this): convention is NOT the path of progression, it never has been, if anything it is contrary to it as can be. The fundamentalists have chimed the same nonsensical mantra that only couples capable of bearing children can be legitimized. How can the "be fruitful and multiply" ideology POSSIBLY hold credence TODAY? It defies the balance of the earth
@llewellleo For that matter, why not understand the "culture" of heterosexual proponents. Let's talk about that! You've said gays are 50% more likely to influence homosexuality among offspring, yet heterosexual couples remain MOST culpable of this phenomena, and always have. In this day in age I dont see the big deal; heterosexuality is exclusively resoinsible for exponential population boom, and to stunted conservatives the mere notion of merely impeding the process of creating hordes of...
These demonstrations were great, for they made the theocratic leaders in Salt Lake City realize that there was a price to pay for their pushing hatred against other Americans. There need to be more demonstration of this nature to push that point home.
RCSVirginia 1 month ago
@brianh406 is that so? affected by the heatwave are you?
llewellleo 6 months ago
@brianh406 When did you escape from the nut house? Seems they're not missing you. Hmmm
llewellleo 6 months ago
@MIS315 lol, yes your majesty.
llewellleo 6 months ago
@MIS315 Of course you would shoot of your mouth about this and automatically assume it was a religious statistic meant to deceive but you are wrong. When I get back ill supply all the figures and source and then you can judge for yourself.
llewellleo 6 months ago
@llewellleo ...of the workforce. It seems youve managed to warp your mind into being convinced the fashion industry is a conspiracy to demonize heterosexuals. Those gay designers do NOT innovate trends; they emulate archetypes that heterosexuals already ascribe to. Women don't give a damn about being postergirls for gay fashion, they care about aesthetically pleasing ungrateful demanding high-expectant STRAIGHT men, who happen to have more of an influence on their wardrobes than any gay man.
MIS315 6 months ago
@llewellleo I dont know how you intend to "understand a culture" by investigating a single venue. Contrary to what you've seen on Entertainment Weekly or nexttopmodel, the gay community is NOT centralized in one stereotyped venue as you seem to believe. They are everywhere; it just so happens fashion is a branch that deploys and warrants pizzaze and finesse, and naturally as it is regularly televised and publicly deployed, it is what you've been informed of. Gays are localized in every branch...
MIS315 6 months ago
@llewellleo And this is the last time I will address the fashion industry, for your personal hangups really don't validate the argument as credible. Personally, I have no affiliation to fashion because I see it as an exploitative industry and want no part of it, to me it is nothing more than frivolity. You speak of the GAY COMMUNITY promoting unrealistic standards? There are so many fallacies to this argument I really dont know where to begin or whether to even address them.but I'll at least try
MIS315 6 months ago
@llewellleo ...infants is outrageous! A travesty! A travesty to what?? Convention??? The path of the bible? This just in (and I'd pay attention to this): convention is NOT the path of progression, it never has been, if anything it is contrary to it as can be. The fundamentalists have chimed the same nonsensical mantra that only couples capable of bearing children can be legitimized. How can the "be fruitful and multiply" ideology POSSIBLY hold credence TODAY? It defies the balance of the earth
MIS315 6 months ago
@llewellleo For that matter, why not understand the "culture" of heterosexual proponents. Let's talk about that! You've said gays are 50% more likely to influence homosexuality among offspring, yet heterosexual couples remain MOST culpable of this phenomena, and always have. In this day in age I dont see the big deal; heterosexuality is exclusively resoinsible for exponential population boom, and to stunted conservatives the mere notion of merely impeding the process of creating hordes of...
MIS315 6 months ago