Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

LS1 Dyno Pull

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
3,513
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 14, 2007

This is my 2000 LS1 Firebird Formula on the dyno. Mods are: Heads, Cam, LS6 intake, Hooker ceramic coated headers, Hooker ORY, Borla XR1 muffler, Moser 12-bolt, Textralia clutch...flywheel...and pressure plate, MSD's.
Dynoed 413 rwhp and 394 ft lbs.

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (tyketto8)

  • IDK I homestly think LT1 is better for more aftermarketing. A simple cam swap in the LT1 and a tune will put atleast 350rwhp. LT1 was better laid out as far as doing simple maintaince on the engine. As far as extrior(body) and interior the LS1 is way more refined and better looking. Their isn't much arguing here though. They both use the same tranny autos 4L60-E or a T56 borg warner same 10 bolt rear end.

  • @Smokie420ish

    That may have been true in the past but I've seen cam only LS1's put down way more rwhp than 350 and more torque. Which is why we have cam only LS1's running low 11's and our fastest cam only LT1 is running low 12's. When it comes to performance and horsepower, there's no denying that the LS1 is superior when the same mods are added to each. It's not so much an oppinion but rather a fact.

  • The only thing better about the LT1 over the LS1 is that the LT1's are cheaper to buy. LOL

  • I don't think there is a single thing better about the LT1's. If you don't believe me, then take a stock LT1 and race a stock LS1. Or just drive through some heavy rain and think about your comment when your changing your opti-spark!

see all

All Comments (21)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @onesicss They're basically about the same as far as maintenance goes. They're both a pain in the ass. Some things are easier on an LSX motor, some are easier on an LTX. Just depends on what maintenance you're doing.

  • r u kidding me! lt1.... easier than ls for maintinence.... haaaaa right ok....

  • @tyketto8 I do agree with anything newer usually is gonna be better. GM wouldn't have put out a weaker engine in their newer muscle cars. We all know GM under rates their engines and how the LS1 was one of the most under rated engines.

  • Stock for stock the LS1 is better. Yes to everybody I have drove a 94 Z28 Camaro and a 98 TA.

  • The Trans Am is a Firebird. There's the Firebird Coupe V6, Firebird Formula LS1, Firebird Trans Am, Firebird Formula Firehawk, and the Firebird Trans Am Firehawk...but they're all in the Firebird family.

  • Ls1's are way better than LT1's. My friend has a LT1 camaro and I have a LS1 firebird. Trust me LS1 blows the LT1 away every time.

  • ls1 is way better than lt1. nuff said.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more