WTC7 fires

NBC 9/11 16:49

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 9/11
• wtc7
• fires

[aczjbr]

EUROPE DIRECT. An eminent French scientist who is the conspiracy against the disease. Even on WTC7. Will CIA agent?

Je m'appelle Claude Valette. Je suis un physicien (supraconductivité, puis acoustique musicale, puis astrophysique), retraité, anciennement Directeur de Recherche au CNRS.

WTC physique rumeur - Physique de l’effondrement des tours du World Trade Center, WTC2, WTC1, WTC7, analyse de la rumeur, 50 pages en pdf par Claude Valette.

h t t p : / / claudevalette.unblog.fr/

[aczjbr]

The British newspaper, The Guardian, announces what is true of the towers. With the help of Purdue University and National Geographic.

The Guardian home

Simulation shows why World Trade Center towers fell: it's the heat

National Geographic has a fascinating simulation of why the US World Trade Center towers collapsed after the planes hit them on September 11 2001.

w w w . guardian.co.uk/technology/blog­/2009/sep/10/9-11-towers-simul­ation-engineering

[aczjbr]

URGENT - FRAUD "A & E TRUTH."

Effondrement des tours jumelles

The analysis of the explosives expert Jowenko was used by conspiracy theorists to show that WTC 7 was deliberately demolished. In the same interview, he explains that the controlled demolition of the twin towers is impossible. Dynamite would have exploded right away, and it would have taken a year to put everything in place. in English.

w w w . dailymotion . com/video/x2l5k9_effondrement-­­des-tours-jumelles_news

[hgfbob]

@aczjbr

choo choo charlie!!!

Less than free-fall means there was at least air resistance. But when it comes to a building collapse the resistance should be MASSIVE, so a few seconds less than free-fall speed does not equate to resistance in the system that should have been there. The symmetry shows that there was no resistance from the buildings structure, as that resistance cannot be symmetrical unless controlled.

waiting for YOU to PROVE ME WRONG!

[hgfbob]

@aczjbr

"I´m an engineer '

then POST something to PROVE your claims Mr. Engineer!!!

"The facts say that the south Tower when tumbling reached WTC7, "

NOT according to the OFFICIAL INVESTIGATION shill LIAR!

NCSTAR1A p.39/130

"Other than initiating the fires in WTC 7, the damage from the debris from WTC 1 had little effect on initiating the collapse of WTC 7."

show me that there can be symmetry through a complete collapse if there is resistance in the system, till then you have no argument.

[aczjbr]

Rio de Janeiro. I´m an engineer and in the videos for-conspiracy they´re liars. It´s 1 disease of paranoid. Distorting the facts and lied to justify such conspiracy. That video gives facts that in basing. In all of the universities of engineering of my country the towers and WTC7 are studied. The facts say that the south Tower when tumbling reached WTC7, damaging seriously, including the sprinklers and beginning 1 fire. The patients wanted that if it saved the building without firemen

[hgfbob]

@cassius969

"You can only debate somebody if he is willing to admit defeat"

amazing.....isn't it?

but I'm not looking to debate these shills, but rather pointing out the direct lying, and the fact that there are 'shills' here just for that purpose....as you have read..

lol..they REALLY get angry when there is nothing they can post...don't they!!!

[cassius969]

@hgfbob You can only debate somebody if he is willing to admit defeat.

[hgfbob]

@Oz1976

"You're a fucking idiot'

well, seems that YOU ARE, since THAT reply is ALL you can post.......lol

tell me how someone, YEARS AFTER the investigation, OFFICIALLY claim there is "NO explosives or accelerants used to assist", when the INVESTIGATION never tested for a determination either way.

"NIST did not test for the residue from explosives or accelerants" wtc. nist. gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_200­6. htm

so idiot....what ye say?

[Oz1976]

@hgfbob You're a fucking idiot.