100 Reasons why Evolution is stupid 1-11

http://www.evanwiggs.com/articles/reasons.html#Reason1 http://creation.com/qa#faqs If you not believe in creation then it is still not a reason to reject God there are Christians that believe in evolution and that God used the Big bang to created the universe.my video's have strong evidence that creation is the better explanation.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• jesuslostchildren777

[stoicsquirrel]

@KJVWordofGod In other words, you don't know what a scientific theory is and you don't want to sound uneducated so you try to shift the argument to something else. Fair enough. BTW, you might want to actually READ the article on Wikipedia's site. Specifically the part under "Misuse". It mentions how people like YOU use the term improperly. This is why you think it means a dog might give birth to...say... a cat. You don't understand the term.

[KJVWordofGod]

@stoicsquirrel Mr. Squirrel, I cannot waste my time teaching you all the things you need to know to participate in this discussion. Look up macro evolution yourself....it's even in the dumbest of all places...wikipedia. Once you get an education, (and that's a thorough education), come back and join the discussion.

[stoicsquirrel]

@KJVWordofGod I'm pretty sure that the term "macro-evolution" is not a scientific term. That aside, you still don't understand what a theory is. Why don't you explain to me what you think scientific theory is so why get get this sorted out before we move on.

[KJVWordofGod]

@stoicsquirrel If a theory had indisputable supporting evidence it would no longer be a theory. You need a dictionary....and an animal husbandry lesson. No dog ever produced a non-dog. Micro evolution is the only type of evolution that has any truth to it....and even though there are changes WITHIN the species, that is not evidence for macro evolution....dogs still produce only dogs. You have been brainwashed. You believe everything a "teacher" tells you? That makes you a dupe.

[stoicsquirrel]

@Drummr88 First of all, it says stretched. Past-tense. The problem is that it's still expanding. It also says the Earth is a circle(Isiah 40). Not a sphere.

[stoicsquirrel]

@KJVWordofGod You think that if a theory had evidence then it would be a fact? I don't think you understand what a scientific theory is. They are used to explain the facts. For instance, when you drop something it falls. That's a fact. The theory explains WHY something falls when you drop it. The same goes for evolution. Animals change over time. That is a fact. The theory of evolution explains WHY that happens.

[stoicsquirrel]

@KJVWordofGod He didn't say that any theory involving God was "automatically not plausible". He said it was rubbish. If you understood the scientific method (something you would learn in a public school) then you would know that, since we use science to learn about the natural world, you can't use the supernatural as an explanation in science. If you do, it's no longer science and is therefore rubbish.

[stoicsquirrel]

@KJVWordofGod It seems you're a poor victim of a Christian education. There are several theories of how the universe got to where it is now and NONE of them say we say that "nothing exploded". Either you are lying on purpose or you have been told by one to many Creationists like Hovind that that is what scientists say.

[KJVWordofGod]

@speciwacy If your theory had evidence, it would be fact. As it is, evolution is a failed theory in search of evidence. It is a religion that requires faith. It has no proof. If you accept the so called *evidence* to support the theory of evolution, you are not much of thinker....just a sheep blindly following *so called* science in the vain hope your leaders will one day actually find proof. BTW, there is so much SECULAR evidence for Jesus Christ that only a fool would reject it.

[speciwacy]

@KJVWordofGod theories have evidence, your god does not..