Stanley A Meyer - Water Fuel Cell patent 4,798,661

Stan Meyer hydrogen cell new design is water injected internal rods resonate,
At about a kilo watt output can be as high as 6 liters per min,
Uses Tap water and stays clean as it is "self cleaning" the unit consumes water
about 1 quart per hour and will not get hot even after hours of running.
uses very small amount of power, more testing needed for hard data.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Water
• Fuel
• Cell
• Stan
• Stanley
• Meyer
• HHO

[devushkar100]

the one who disliked this video is the killer of stan

[sorova]

@manofthevideo eh?

[manofthevideo]

@sorova Right, A solid object is a liquid, keep on telling yourself that...

[sorova]

@book1a Resonance has nothing to do with getting more energy out than you put in. In the same way a bridge can oscillate itself to bits if it is not damped properly. You can do the same thing with an LC circuit too. You are not getting our more energy than you put in. if that were the case you could just have a resonant circuit and pass the mains into it! All that is happening is that the glass is more sensite to a narrow band of frequencies. Get the right tone and it breaks.

[book1a]

@sorova You are, of course, entitled to you opinion. But I dont think anyone is entitled to influence others (yes, including myself, I admit) without fully investigating and experimentation.The Wright bros made the first flight while scientific papers were being published about flight being impossible. I keep thinking of an opera singer hitting a freq to make a glass break. She doesnt input more energy, just tunes her voice to the res freq of the glass.

[sorova]

@book1a Yes it's a Hoax. Of course it is. People are making money out of it with conversion kits. The US military will investigate anything that has potential, even if it doesn't work. They even looked at using psychics at one time during the cold war. Nothing wrong with cracking water and burning the fuel, but it doesn't come from nothing, you need more energy in than you get out.

[book1a]

@sorova IT CANT BE CLOESED IF THERE IS MORE ENERGY OUT THAN IN. You said that yourself! If the combined electrical/chemical potential energy input does excedes the electrical/chemical potential output then there is an extra, unaccounted for, energy being used or the equatins are wrong. Or are you just saying that the whole water cell idea in a hoax, with the U.S. military joining in?

[sorova]

@book1a This is nonsense, it is a closed system! Don't confuse people by saying that energy is coming from elsewhere because it isn't.

[book1a]

The most popular theory is akin to an opera singer hitting a specific note to shatter a wine glass. Consider the interferance patterns of light waves. These things dont just happen on the macro scale. All particals and waves are susceptable to other electromagnetic frequencies (except, so far, neutrinos). There's still so much that even advanced physics cant yet explain. Anyone that wants to experiment in unknown waters has a duty to do so, dispite the posts of the "flat earth society".

[book1a]

@sorova Another person that conveniantly forgets that conservation of energy applies ONLY to a closed system. Have you read about photoelectrics? Or that that the mass of a nucleus is reduced with the emittion of energy? Meyers and others have made this work as claimed. Noboby knows why. Does a specific frequency create a condition that allows photons or neutrinos to effect the molecules? Its all speculation at the moment. So please dont discorage others with half-assed negativity.