Sandia Study.mov

Does the tail of the F4 decelerate?

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• 9/11

[zonsb]

Six minute video of the crash from multiple camera angles. watch?v=LWL1hwPQFoo

[zonsb]

So a plane can't both make a silhouette hole and disintegrate. Be invincible one instant then be so fragile as to vaporize the next instant.

[aeroflop]

@cycimian - The F4's wingspan is clearly greater than the width of the concrete block, so what we're seeing is the sheared-off right wingtip flying past the block, i.e. the wing does not cut through it. There's a more complete version of this crash test (added 4 years ago, in colour, with commentary and footage from multiple camera positions) available on YouTube. Everything that actually impacts the block (i.e. everything except the wingtips) is obliterated. The block survives intact.

[semisonicTV]

notice that little flash at the bottom, like in all the films, on underside.....umm good clip!!

[MandoMohan]

Oh, there's deceleration alright, it comes to a very sudden standstill and then reverses out of there in little pieces.

5*

[uheardmebitch]

i always find it weird that no one has the rest of the clip. we never get to see the damagae. we don't even know how much of the plane survived., if any. i wish we could find the original.

[cycimian]

Pentagon quoting Rumsfeld the airbus evaporated. Collapsing into that tiny hole.

Amazing what happens when you use your eyes and do the research on the internet. Here we see the classic example of the wings not folding back. The sudden brakeing caused by impact actualy added the kinetic force to the wing and it cut like an axe rather then fold back. Anyways great vid. Thanks for highlighting something the mainstreams afraid to talk about.

[MegsHead]

no deceleration but the plane is GONE.