Damascus and Jeursalem in a 1936 documentary

Touristic view of Damascus and Jerusalem, showing the Church of the Holy Sepulcher, Haram-esh-Sherif, Mount of Olives, the Wailing Wall, the Jaffa Gate in the old west wall of the city and the dome of the rock.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Syria
• Damascus
• Jeursalem
• History
• 1936

[am231e]

The most wonderful info in this movie, is when they mentioned that they went from Damascus in Syria to Jerusalem in Palestine !! I wish to see this holy city back to where it belongs, not to the Israelis.

[AzdKahlan]

Then go back to Mongolia...

[ryolight]

@LearnedHand2008

do you really believe your lies???? give up a land which didn't belong to it by first place, theef.

[ryolight]

WATCH OCCUPATION 101

[ryolight]

@LearnedHand2008

Exactly, that's a strong theef situation, once we become strong enough to take back our stolen land, you'll come by yourselves and return the stolen land and go back to your original countries like Russia or Africe, etc.

Watch occupation 101.

[LearnedHand2008]

Your argument about Israeli power is circular: if Israel is powerful enough to defend itself, any peace treaty it signs is meaningless because it was forced on the Arabs. But if it isn't powerful enough to defend itself, it is destroyed. So basically you're saying there's no way Israel can exist and make a peace that's real.

[LearnedHand2008]

@am231e

You're right. Israel has legal borders with Egypt, Lebanon, and Jordan. It doesn't have legal borders with Palestine or Syria. What does this prove? The US Constitution doesn't have borders in it either; does this mean the US is a cancer?

[LearnedHand2008]

@am231e

You're right, Egypt isn't allowed to militarize the Sinai. So what? Israel doesn't occupy it, Egypt does. There are plenty of demilitarized areas in the world that are considered sovereign territory...this is a big example of Israel giving up land, but you ignore it because you WANT to think Israel is only aggressive. You just don't like the evidence that says otherwise.

[am231e]

@LearnedHand2008

Yes, but Egypt can enter a tank in their Sinai? and Israel is the higher hand in that treaty, while Egypt is somehow surrender one.

What is the logic of giving back your land after making you a poppet in my hand? It's only pure military power would force you to accept it the way it is. Being a cancer-state,it has no borders in its constitution, it can expand the time they want and as far as their power can take them. and there is always an excuse for their aggressive attitude

[LearnedHand2008]

@am231e

Tell me again: what is "foreign" about an Israeli Jew who was born in Israel and speaks only Hebrew?

[LearnedHand2008]

@am231e

Actually, its been 62 years of freedom for the Jewish people. That matters to some people.

Your argument pretty much boils down to this: When Arabs conquer a country, they have rights there forever, and when Jews conquer a country, they will never have rights there.

[LearnedHand2008]

@am231e

Thats weird, I hadn't noticed the Muslims recognizing the rights of the Jewish people who came before them! I'm pretty sure the who "Hamas" thing is about NOT recognizing Jewish rights